No. Just because something moves does not mean it is living.
I doubt it.
what the *_*
No, a river is considered a non-living thing because it does not have the characteristics of life such as growth, reproduction, or response to stimuli. Rivers are natural flowing bodies of water that serve important ecological functions in the environment.
A variety of rocks.
Ever living thing have bacteria
A river is compiled of water and water is made up of the elements hydrogen and oxygen. It does not have the properties of living things so the answer is - no.
A river is compiled of water and water is made up of the elements hydrogen and oxygen. It does not have the properties of living things so the answer is - no.
I don't think that a river is living. Does it breath? Does it eat? NO. Exactly why it's not living.Also it cant reproduce and I doubt it has any cells since living things must have one or more cells that is something all iving things have in common.
A running car engine requires energy but is not a living thing. The engine converts fuel into mechanical energy to power the vehicle.
Are you a living thing? Yes.Do you run out of energy after running a marathon?Yes.Therefore, living things do use energy for movement.
Th ebuilding of a dam would affect a living thing because it destroys habbitats, but it also can create new species. cbell
a river is a nonliving thing because it doesn't have the 13 characteristics of life- moving, cells, dieing, breathing, eating and drinking, growing, reproducing, excreting wastes, and other complicated stuff