0
Is a scientific hypothesis accepted if there is no way to demonstrate the hypothesis wrong?
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
A scientific hypothesis is not accepted if there is no way to demonstrate the hypothesis wrong. In fact, if there is no way to demonstrate the hypothesis wrong, then it is unfalsifiable and unscientific. For example, if I hypothesize that an all-powerful being created the Universe, there is no way to demonstrate that this hypothesis is wrong. One might argue that none of the natural laws of science require the intervention of an all-powerful being, but then I would simply argue that is because the being designed things that way. Because I can come up with any unfalsifiable explanation for any objection not only is there no way to demonstrate that my hypothesis is wrong, there is also no scientific reason or evidence to believe it is right.
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is a hypothesis accepted if there is no way to demonstrate that the hypothesis is wrong?
Yes Because.!!(:
Is a scientific hypotheses accepted if there is no way to demonstrate that the hypothesis is wrong?
the statement that an object at rest will remain at rest unless acted upon by a force is an example of using of the following?
Is a scientific hypothesis accepted if there is no way way to prove that the hypothesis is wrong?
No. Not being able to prove something is NOT the same as it being true.
How does the scientific method work if your hypothesis is wrong?
You make a new hypothesis and then start over from the research.
Which is more helpful- proving a hypothesis wrong or supporting a hypothesis?
it depend if the hypothesis is good or wrong. depends if the hypothesis is correct. An hypothesis is, in simple terms, a "guess" based on observed data. For this reason, the data to support any hypothesis can be manipulated to prove it either "right" or "wrong". Neither is more helpful. All scientific endeavour should be tested and retested.
Is a scientific hypothesis accepted if there is no way to demonstrate that it is wrong?
It is accepted if the data support it.
Is a scientific hypothesis a accepted if there is no way to demonstrate that the hypothesis is wrong?
If you develop an experiment that truly demonstrates that the hypothesis is wrong*, then the hypothesis will lose its acceptance in the scientific community.* Such an experiment would have to be repeatable by other scientists AND accepted by interested scientists as a proof that the hypothesis is wrong.
Is a hypothesis accepted if there is no way to demonstrate that the hypothesis is wrong?
Yes Because.!!(:
Is a scientific hypotheses accepted if there is no way to demonstrate that the hypothesis is wrong?
the statement that an object at rest will remain at rest unless acted upon by a force is an example of using of the following?
Is a scientist hypothesis accepted if there is no way to prove that they hypothesis is wrong?
If you develop an experiment that truly demonstrates that the hypothesis is wrong*, then the hypothesis will lose its acceptance in the scientific community. * Such an experiment would have to be repeatable by other scientists AND accepted by interested scientists as a proof that the hypothesis is wrong.
Is a scientific hypothesis accepted if there is no way way to prove that the hypothesis is wrong?
No. Not being able to prove something is NOT the same as it being true.
Is the best definition of a scientific theory?
A scientific theory is an extensively tested hypothesis that is accepted as the best answer we can come up with, since nobody has been able to prove it wrong yet.
What is the scientific theory definition?
A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is based on a body of evidence and has undergone rigorous testing and validation. It is a framework that helps us understand and predict natural phenomena. Scientific theories are supported by empirical data and are subject to revision in light of new evidence.
Can a hypothesis be proven correct?
In science terms, a hypothesis can only be proven "not wrong". The way it works is that scientists, including the one who stated the hypothesis, try their hardest to demonstrate that the given hypothesis is wrong. If they are successful, then the hypothesis is discarded. If, after many tries, no one can prove the hypothesis is wrong, then it might attain the glorious status of a Theory. As an example, look at the hypothesis of global warming. Almost everyone is running around trying to prove it correct. There are very few following the true scientific process of trying to prove it wrong.
How does the scientific method work if your hypothesis is wrong?
You make a new hypothesis and then start over from the research.
Is the following sentence true or falseBefore a hypothesis can become an accepted part of scientific knowledgeit must be tested and analyised.?
Although the spelling may be wrong in places, the sentence is true.
What does it mean to say that if a hypothesis is scientific then there must be means of proving that it was wrong?
kkk
