0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
After a person admitts guilt during interrogation what happens next?
After admitting guilt during an interrogation, the person's statement will be documented and may be used as evidence during legal proceedings. They might be arrested and charged with the crime, or they may have the opportunity to negotiate a plea deal. The next steps will depend on the specifics of the case and the legal system of the jurisdiction in which the interrogation took place.
What is a statement of guilt called?
im just asking what is it!
Who proves guilt in a case?
The prosecution will show the evidence and present the testimony that indicates guilt. The defending attorney will try to punch holes in the evidence and testimony. The jury then decides what the facts are based on the testimony and evidence.
Does the prosecution and the defense present evidence?
Yes, both the prosecution and the defense present evidence in a trial. The prosecution presents evidence to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, while the defense presents evidence to create doubt or support the defendant's innocence. Both sides have the opportunity to call witnesses, introduce documents or physical evidence, and present arguments to support their case.
What is the importance of evidences?
Exculpatory evidence frees your suspect from guilt. Hide it if you can
What is mean by expulcatory?
Exculpatory evidence at trial is evidence which helps to prove the innocence of the person on trial. The opposite word is inculpatory, evidence which proves his guilt.
What is the least important consideration in the gathering of evidence at a crime?
Guilt of the suspect(s)
The word circumstantial in a sentence?
The evidence was circumstantial and not enough to prove any guilt.
Can you be denied a copy of a signed statement?
It depends on what kind of statement it is, who owns it, and what your interest is in it.
When an attorney gives a statement of disapproval about evidence from the opposing side what is that statement called?
He is challenging the "admissability" of the evidence (i.e.- he is saying that it is "nadmissable").
Who makes the decision at trial that the evidence offered is relevant?
Relevant evidence is ANY evidence which will tend to prove either the guilt (or innocence) of the defendant on trial. Therefore, anything that is not NOT relevant is NOT EVIDENCE and will not be admitted.
What does a jury do in a court room?
listens to the evidence presented then renders a decision of guilt or innocence
