constant
a scientific theory is a description of an observed phenomenon while a scientific theory is an explanation of an observed phenomenon
A scientific theory is accepted as factual even though it hasn't been proven. A scientific law has been proven as fact.
a theorem rather, it has to be proven to become an accepted theory.
No. A hypothesis is a proposed statement in science. When a hypothesis is constantly proven and accepted by the scientific community, it becomes known as a theory. Even a theory is not a LAW of physics. The only laws that exist in science are those that can be proven through math. While unbreakable laws of physics exist, if it cannot be mathematically proven, a scientific hypothesis is not an unbreakable law of physics.
This questions borders on jibberish. Could you rephrase it, please?
a scientific theory is a description of an observed phenomenon while a scientific theory is an explanation of an observed phenomenon
A scientific theory is a theory that explains the scientist's observations, whereas a scientific law is a repeated pattern in the world that we have not sought an explanation for.Also, a scientific theory is proven correct in this time, but may not be correct during future times.
I believe that a conclusion is a proven idea or experiment with complete evidence, while a theory cannot be totally proven but has been tested enough to be widely believed and accepted by the scientific community.
A scientific theory is accepted as factual even though it hasn't been proven. A scientific law has been proven as fact.
a theorem rather, it has to be proven to become an accepted theory.
a theorem rather, it has to be proven to become an accepted theory.
The Big Bang Theory is very well accepted by the scientific community; it is considered to be solidly supported, and it is regarded as the best theory that we presently have, to explain the origin of the universe as we know it.
No. He died in 1930 and it wasn't until the sixties that the theory was accepted by the mainstream scientific community.
No. A hypothesis is a proposed statement in science. When a hypothesis is constantly proven and accepted by the scientific community, it becomes known as a theory. Even a theory is not a LAW of physics. The only laws that exist in science are those that can be proven through math. While unbreakable laws of physics exist, if it cannot be mathematically proven, a scientific hypothesis is not an unbreakable law of physics.
A scientific theory become a law when it is widely recognized and accepted by the scientific community in the epoch.
lol
Alfred Wegener was the proponent of the Continental Drift Theory. The scientific community accepted this theory due to the phenomena of paleomagnetism, sea floor spreading and plate tectonics.