That depends on how far out you want to go. Depending on the range of relation you mean, tigers can be related to dogs, mammals, hagfish, or even animals in general.
anything other than golf
They are completely different. One is aquatic life and the other is a mammal. The name only comes from the markings. Other than that, there is no relation.
Yes, even though a tiger is of a the cat family, it is more closely related to a dog than that of a whale and a fish because a whale is a mammal but a fish is not.
A tiger is at the top of the food chain and has no predators other than man.
A tiger could possibly eat a premature baby in one bite - but anything larger than that, no way!
Dingoes live in Australia, tigers in Asia. Tigers can't eat dingoes due to geographical separation.
...other than Tiger... i was told it was.. .Ben hogan and Byran
Anything Other Than Naked has 100 pages.
The ISBN of Anything Other Than Naked is 193-6183838.
yes a tiger
The skin of a tiger is the skin of a tiger. It doesn't get much more simple than that. It's not too different from the skin of any other similar animal.
Bali tiger had a short, dense fur that was of a deep orange colour and carried darker and fewer stripes than the other tiger subspecies