non-living
No. It is nonliving.
A virus is considered non-living. It does not have all the characteristics of a living thing unlike bacteria. Viruses need living cells to reproduce while any living things can reproduce (asexually or not).
There is some debate about the status of a virus, whether it is living, not living, or some intermediary condition.
at first i was crying but then it just hit me it was a stupied virus
This is (generally) referring to a VIRUS particle. Viruses can reproduce (a characteristic of living organisms) but may also be crystallised (a characteristic of non-living organisms). For this reason, a good number of scientists prefer not to talk of a virus as a living thing and even find discord classifying it under the normal taxonomic concepts and rules.
both the living and nonliving components of the biosphere.
All are made from matter.
Yes
a virus
It can't because it is NOT a living organism.
Ecosystem.
first of all virus is not an organism. it lacks cell, tissue and organ because of this virus is an entity or macro molecule rather than an organism.since virus is not organism it i9s also not living thing. virus is intermediate between living and non-living.