Yes an imprint is considered a fossil if it was created by life and the animal/plant/fungi in question is no longer alive. It is generally assumed that only if it is very old it is a fossil but technically this is not so.
A fossil is the preserved remains or traces of a once-living organism, while an imprint is a mark or indentation left behind by an organism on a surface. Fossils can include imprints, but not all imprints are considered fossils. Fossils provide more detailed information about the organism's structure and biology, while imprints are more surface-level.
fossil
An imprint fossil is formed when an animal or plant makes a print in the soil. Such as a footprint.
A fossil created by a print or impression is called an imprint. The word "imprint" means to produce a mark a on a surface with the use of pressure.
either: cast fossil petrified fossil imprint fossil trace fossil
fossil
fossil
A trace fossil was an imprint left behind by an animal that hardens and turns to stone
fossil
a fossil
igneous..
Fossil