Uh...Sub S Corps are income tax pass throughs and don't pay any. Generally, Taxes - like sales tax collections or payroll withholdings, etc are considered trust funds - funds of anothers that the company is responsible for. Actions to collect them may pierce the corporate veil and Officers of a corporation, even if not really involved with tax matters, are responsible for them personally. In practicality, only when there is fraud or intentional failure to pay is this pursued.
This is a double sided question. The direct answer is that Obama will not raise taxes on S-Corporations. S-Corporations rarely pay taxes. Their profits flow through a schedule K-1 to the owners individual income tax return.If Obama raises personal income taxes, which he probably will, then yes you will pay more.The biggest issue with Obama and S-Corporations is the fact that Obama wants the profits from an S-Corporation to be subject to Social security Taxes. Under present law, an owner of an S-Corporation can take distributions of profits and not pay social security taxes. The only tax you pay on S-Corp profits is federal income taxes. If he does pass this change then owners of S-Corps will pay upwards of 15.3% of their profits for Social Security Taxes. Thus eliminating the need to form an S-Corp.
Tax benefits, always a welcome subject, are similar whether you have an LLC (limited liability company) or have elected S corp treatment for your corporation.
I worked for the Hertz corp. from 1974 to 1980,am I eligible for a pension?
is trasfer agen for southwqestern bell corp stock
You would abbreviate corporation in a sentence like Corp. Like this: The Ranger's Corp would never allow him to take such a vow. The Corp was gaining popularity everyday.
I'm not a lawyer, but my understanding is that sub s corps do not have "partners", they have shareholders, which is an important distinction, because it means you are definitely not liable unless you signed the personal guaranty. As for the need to sign, that is part of the negotiation - they might insist on it. Also, when signing, there is a distinction between signing as an officer of the corporation vs. signing personally: always sign, "ABC Corp.", then below, "by: Joe Q. Smith, President" which means you are signing as an officer, as distinct from signing as an individual.
Yes
secret
In a corporation, an officer carries out day to day operations, while a director has overall responsibility for the business and answers to shareholders. Often, these functions are carried out by the same people.
It is difficult to determine whether S Corp tax software will be a good fit for filing your small business taxes, but it has been a good option for many. It may work for you but confirmation from the S Corp software company may be a wise choice.
the Mamaluke Sword (officer sword)
Chief Executive Officer
Yes. First, if it isn't an Incorporated business, they most likely are completely totally involved (as the business is normally simply them personally really). And of course, if it is a Corp, the officers may be personally liable for some things...sales and payroll taxes most notably.
Peter.Bensen@mcdonalds.com
I am unfamiliar with a Greek root of "corp" but the Latin root refers to "body"Don't know if this is what is being looked for or not, but hope it helps!]It is a Latin word, not Greek, and it does mean body.So a corp is a body of men and corporal, an officer in command of that body. (AK)
Corporate officers have no individual liability. The corporation pay what it must.
A s-corp is a designation assigned by filing special forms with the IRS. Its a corporation, taxed like a partnership. Thus no liability for officers.