No
False
No
It depends on what the contract is for. If you are agreeing to anything involving real property, the contract must be in writing to be enforceable. However, oral contracts are enforceable for many things.Added: With the exception noted above, in certain instances [i.e.: if witness(es) was present at the agreement and can testify to it], it may be.
Oral contracts are enforceable by law. But there are specific requirements for contracts to be in writing for certain agreements. The sale of real property or a contract that is more than a year in length are examples.
By "legal" I assume that you mean binding. Any contract is an enforceable agreement between two or more parties. Whether written or oral, if the Court can identify the bargain and ascertain that there is consideration (something of value) the Court can enforce the contract.The contract is either binding and enforceable or it is not. Whether it was written down or simply an oral agreement does not matter.If the Court cannot determine what the actual bargain was, the court will likely conclude that there was no contract. With a written contract, the Court may find that a term in the contract was ambiguous. It can then solicit testimony from the parties as to what they meant by that term.For the person seeking to enforce the contract it is always better to have an actual written agreement that can be placed before the Court. The Court will be more certain that there was, in fact, a contract. For this reason oral agreements can be more difficult to enforce. Also, the Statute of Frauds requires certain contracts (such as for the sale of land) to be in writing.Edward X. Clinton, Jr.2009
Some oral contracts can be enforced. Those dealing with real property or longer than a year need to be in writing.
Any contract involving land must be in writing.
Yes, it can be enforced. If it is reasonably clear as to the expectations and time frame involved, the court can rule that it is a valid and enforceable contract.
No, a quasi-contract is not the same as an actual contract. A quasi-contract is an equitable doctrine that permits the recovery of compensation and can be used in court, but it is not an enforceable contract. An actual contract serves the same purpose, and it is enforceable.
It depends on the validity of the contract. If it meets the requirements of a valid contract then it's enforceable.
No, not in Ohio. You can find more information about contracts on any University and/or College Law Library website or within the codes located on 'Anderson Online' website.When one of the parties to an oral contract has filed the matter w/a Court to enforce it, most Courts usually refer to the Ohio Contract Codes as reference to the transactions and/or agreements agreed to and/or breached to determine a ruling.AnswerWith specific reference to the above answer I would be VERY CAUTIOUS about the general statement that verbal contracts are enforceable in the state of OHIO. In just two minutes I found two references (1) Certain types of verbal contracts are not enforceable in Ohio, including the sale of land and answering for anther's debt. And, (2) verbal contracts for amounts in excess of $500.00 are not enforceable. In any case - - regardless of wherever it is that you live, research this question carefully before making any serious commitments either verbally or in writing, all state's laws address this matter differently.AnswerTo say that 'oral contracts' are enforceable in a certain state is misleading. Oral contracts are enforceable. The difficulty always lies in proving their existence. Convincing evidence that a contract existed between the parties must be presented to a judge. The burden of proof lies with the plaintiff. The best evidence is witnesses who were present at the time the oral contract was made and are willing to testify under oath. The judge will hear any testimony about the conduct of the parties. Credibility plays a role in the judge's decision and some judges have developed excellent skill in determining whose story is more credible.The bottom line is that not every oral contract is enforceable, only those where the moving party can provide enough evidence to convince a judge that a contract existed and was breached.
No. Verbal contracts can be enforceable.