No, it would be illegal for the federal government to place such a restriction but not for smaller units of government to do so. This is assuming that you are referring to the United States' constitution and not a particular state. Powers not specifically taken by the federal government in the Constitution are granted to the states. This power is typically allowed to roll downhill to counties, towns, and even subdivisions.
If the restriction is still active according to state laws it must be released by the owner who imposed itIf the restriction is still active according to state laws it must be released by the owner who imposed itIf the restriction is still active according to state laws it must be released by the owner who imposed itIf the restriction is still active according to state laws it must be released by the owner who imposed it
Platt Amendment
Not really...
Platt Amendment look in the book all you history people
Tariffs are the most common type of trade restriction. Trade restrictions are used by the United States in order to ensure protection with domestic industries.
You can unless the court has imposed some sort of restriction saying otherwise.
no slavery or involuntary servitude except as punishment for crimes
Severe economicsanctions were imposed on the country, such as an embargo(severe restriction on trade with other countries) on Iraqi oil.
Platt Amendment
Unless you are under some kind of travel restriction imposed by the court, probably. The question is: Will the United Kingdom admit you to the country?
communism changed it because they all lived the pheasant way of life so they were all equals.
An infinitely omnipotent power would seem able to endure self-imposed restriction(s) to enable both contradiction and paradox.