Depends On The Question....
better than answers.com
WikiAnswers isn't a bad site. It just has its good contributors and bad
The concept of anonymity has both positive and negative aspects. On the positive side, it can protect privacy, encourage free expression, and allow individuals to share sensitive information without fear of repercussions. Conversely, anonymity can also facilitate harmful behaviors, such as cyberbullying or spreading misinformation, as individuals may feel less accountable for their actions. Ultimately, whether anonymity is deemed good or bad often depends on the context and the intentions of those using it.
There is no bad thing about answering a question on WikiAnswers, there are only good things and benefits. Like, for the user that asked the question, now they know the answer that they were longing for. And, you, you just shared your knowledge, doesn't that feel good?
Go see "Nothing But the Truth".
It is not the purpose of WikiAnswers to decide what is "bad" and what is not. That is an issue of personal morals and ethics (and, perhaps, religion).
It is not. Stop slamming Wikianswers.
It can go down easily. Your supplier can go bust. It's not as good as WikiAnswers.
No.
no
You know that you will get a good answer because if there is a bad answer, a contributer will come and improve it.
no.