All land on planet Earth south of 60 degrees, which includes Antarctica, is governed by the Antarctic Treaty (1960). It is not necessary to add the burden of being a World Heritage Site to its protection.
It was put on the world heritage list in 1987.
the world heritage list was established in 1990's
Machu Picchu was put on the world heritage list in 1983
The statue of liberty was listed on the world heritage list in 1981
Antarctica -- all land south of 60 degrees S -- is already protected by the Antarctic Treaty. The purpose of declaring any geography as a World Heritage Site is to protect its culture -- Antarctica has none; and its physical significance. There is no reason to add the burden of declaring it a World Heritage Site.
The Sagarmatha National Park where Mount Everest can be found is on the World Heritage List.
No. Antarctica is governed by the Antarctic Treaty, so there is no reason to add the burden of a World Heritage Site administration to this continent.
1986
Yes it is go to unesco world heritage site and you will find it there
The Great Barrier Reef was placed on the World Heritage List in 1981.It was one of 15 World Heritage Listed regions that was added to the National Heritage List on 21 May 2007.
Convention concerning the Protection of World Cultural and Natural Heritage