Generally, yes, because injuries are more likely in football.
No. Football is more physical than basketball. The average force of impact of tackles in football is much stronger than than contact in basketball.
definitely Football is more athletic than basketball
NO
the international space station is longer than a football field
I've been playing basketball my whole life and I have gotten plenty of injuries. My cousin on the other hand, has been playing football and we have the same amount of injuries but his are more severe
basketball and football. basketball is a little bit higher than football, baseball is the least by far.
Yes it does
Football all the way
They are both great sports, however, I find playing basketball better than playing football. ---- The Question of is basketball better than football is not easily answered since it all lies in the realm of opinion.
Faster to go to basketball player than pro football player. Sorry to everyone who is trying to make it to pro football.
This question can go 2 ways: 1) Is a football the outcome of a badly made basketball so they gave it a different name and used it for a sport? A: Maybe but I doubt it. The makers may have been smarter than that. Surely they made the football like it is on purpose. 2) Can my football be used as a basketball because I don't have a basketball and I really want to play basketball right now!? Q: NO! The football would be a horrible basketball!
Yes, football games are longer than Basketball games. If you're referring to football or soccer, it has game duration of 90 minutes. While American foot has a four 15-minute quarters so that's a total of 60 minutes a game. Meanwhile, a baskeball game consists of four 12-minute quarters and a total of 48 minutes per game.