No, it is a non-renewable form of energy.
No, it is a non-renewable form of energy.
Energy from the burning of fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas) is non-renewable.
Burning coal, and nuclear reactors using Pu-239
Electrical energy is a PRODUCED energy, not a SOURCE energy. It is produced by other things- burning oil, gas or coal, or uranium uses non-renewable energy.
Coal and uranium are not renewable resources of energy.
It is a non-renewable source of energy. Which means that once it is used up it cannot be reused unlike renewable energy such as solar or wind energy which is constantly produced and will never run out.add. Coal is such a collection of complex hydrocarbons, that burning coal is quite analogous to burning the books of a library to heat the boilers. It is non-renewable and we should not destroy its unique substance in a trivial manner.
Coal is a non-renewable resource.
NO!
Fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas) and nuclear power are all non-renewable energy.
Similar to coal, its burnt. But its better because you're burning renewable sources. :D
Renewable forms of energy are sources that can be replenished quickly and easily. These include plants, the sun, wind, water, etc. Non-renewable forms of energy aren't easily replenished. For example coal is formed over millions of years. Even though there might be more deposits of coal unfound which we can mine to replenish our stock, coal is non-renewable.
Coal is a NON-renewable energy as when burnt, the Coal combusts, emitting carbon dioxide, among other harmful products. A renewable energy would be wind or tidal or solar energy for example.