No,because the trees are limited and used for oxygen.
One disadvantage of burning fossil fuels for energy is the release of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, which contributes to climate change. Additionally, extracting and burning fossil fuels can lead to environmental pollution and habitat destruction. Finally, fossil fuels are a non-renewable resource, meaning they will eventually run out.
Yes, certainly it does
well, you have renewable energy such as wind power, wave power etc... all this generates electricity without burning fossil fuels
nuclear energy and burning fossil fuels to push turbines that make electricity. ************************************************* the two main sources are burning lots of fossil fuels and nuclear energy
Since wind energy doesn't require the burning of fossil fuels, it doesn't create pollution or greenhouse gases.
the burning of fossil fuels creates thermal energy, which in this case is on the from of steam, which then in turn rotates a turbine
Fossil fuels can be burned to release the potential chemical energy stored millions of years ago.The process of burning fuels is called Combustion.
This kind of energy is called renewable energy.
Fossil fuels represent chemical energy, a form of potential energy. This energy was stored in the hydrocarbon molecules and can be released by oxidation (burning).
Fossil fuels represent chemical energy, a form of potential energy. This energy was stored in the hydrocarbon molecules and can be released by oxidation (burning).
Burning fossil fuels turns potential energy into kinetic energy. Kinetic energy is energy in motion, which can be used to do work.
One disadvantage of burning fossil fuels for energy is that it releases greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, contributing to climate change. Additionally, fossil fuel combustion can lead to air pollution, which can have negative impacts on human health and the environment. Burning fossil fuels is also a non-renewable energy source, meaning it will eventually run out.