Well, it's often less efficient, as a democratic society has to spend a lot of time and resources on campaigns, elections and often not very worthwhile debates. OTOH, citzens in democratic societies tend to be happier and wealthier than those in dictatorships, so maybe it's worth it.
The statement suggests that democracy can lead to tyranny because in a democracy, the majority can potentially oppress the minority, leading to the rise of a tyrannical leader who claims to protect the majority's interests.
Yes. Madison warned against the "tyranny of the majority" in a democracy.
Yes. Madison warned against the "tyranny of the majority" in a democracy.
Yes. Madison warned against the "tyranny of the majority" in a democracy.
DEMOCRACY
Tyranny is a thing of past when democracy was not there. This is a sample sentence containing tyranny.
First as a monarchy, then as an oligarchy, then as a tyranny, then as a democracy, then as a radical democracy.
monarchy oligarchy tyranny democracy thank u :)
Ancient Greece was a Monarchy, oligarchie, tyranny, then a democracy (in order).
Democracy
Its not.
Monarchy, oligarchy, tyranny, democracy, radical democracy.