answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is dividing history into different periods piontless?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about History of Western Civilization

What are the 3 periods of Roman history and why were they divided this way?

The three periods of Roman history were the monarchy, the republic and the principate. They were divided this way by the types of government in those periods.


What is an example of Breaking history into distinct periods of time?

Chronological Thinking


What are the 3 main periods in human history?

The Old Stone Age, the Stone Age, and the Prehestoric Age


What are the periods in history?

History can be divided into many periods in many different ways, depending on what you are interested in and on how wide or narrow a focus you apply. For example, you could define history (and pre-history) as the stone age, the copper age, the bronze age, the iron age, and the steel age; or you could define it as ancient, middle ages, renaissance, and modern. Or you could focus on a region, such as the Americas, and define periods as Pre-Columbian, colonial, post-colonial and modern. Or you could focus on one country and look at periods specific to the history of that country. For England, for example, they might include the pre-Roman period, the Roman period, the Saxon period, the Plantagenet dynasty, the Tudor Period, the Stuart period, the Victorian age, or several other overlapping designations.


How have recent historians changed the way people view history?

Historians of today and those of the past base their writings on many factors, one unfortunately is a bias they may or may not be aware of. One thing is a certainty, all historians have a cultural background that differs in many ways from one another. Clearly there will be different views of various past events depending on a variety of factors. Historians of today's Russia will have different views of the history of the Soviet Union, depending upon their political bias or lack of them. The ordinary person, one without a political or cultural bias will now as in the past, believe the "history" that best suits themselves. Of course, there is no consensus of how people of any particular period of time, viewed history. There are too many variables, too many different peoples, too many different time periods. What is clear today as it has always been, historians have written different versions of the same periods of time and events. There can be no proven way to determine if recent historians have changed the way people view history. This is true if only based on intellectual thought. There can be no "proof" for lack of a better term that anything has changed because the historians of today have the same views, accurate or inaccurate today as in the past. Any historian or student of history will agree to that,.

Related questions

Different blocks of time in history?

Periods


What are the problems faced by historians in dividing the periods in History?

Most issues are based in similarity. Some long periods of history in various places see little change in things like technology, culture, demographics and hence are difficult to be divided into historical periods.


Finding common themes and separating similar time periods from different time periods in history is known as?

Peropdozation


What is a watershed election?

A watershed Election is one that changes history.... "a campaign that decides the course of politics for decades; one that is especially memorable, or that proves to be a dividing line between historical periods."


Why do historian divide history into eras?

Probably because it helps to easily identify different time periods in history that hadsimilar events taking place.


What are the 3 periods of Roman history and why were they divided this way?

The three periods of Roman history were the monarchy, the republic and the principate. They were divided this way by the types of government in those periods.


What is periodisation in History?

Periodization refers to categorizing periods of history by name. Some examples of named periods of history include the Middle Ages, Gothic, and Baroque.


What is architectures significance in history?

Different periods in history are marked by changes in architecture as people's resources and knowledge of those resources changed as we moved slowly into an industrial and then information society


WHAT IS PERIODS USING WORLD HISTORY?

Periods mean eras centuries ages


What period in roman history was characterized by having one supreme ruler?

There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.


Why do historians divide into eras?

Probably because it helps to easily identify different time periods in history that hadsimilar events taking place.


What is a Cherokee name?

Tsali, originally of Coosawattee Town (Kusawatiyi), was a noted figure at two different periods of Cherokee history, both of them vital.