In terms of graphics and gameplay quality, Napoleon is probably the better game. On the other hand, Empire has more re-playability because it is features a much wider game, without the structure and story limits of Napoleon.
For example, a NTW game is going to involve either fighting to stop France, or conquering as France. An ETW game lets you choose your own allies, enemies and expansion plans.
yes,it was
Yes I bought both Empire Total War and Napoleon, and both games run well on it. I do have the 15r special edition, so my computer might be able to play the games a little better than a regular 15r. But yours should be able to play the games fluently on medium/high settings.
Better than you
The Mughal empire is better than the Maratha empire.
No such thing. There have been two French Empires under Napoleon I and Napoleon III; the term 'Third Empire' comes up whenever a President seems to be getting bigger ideas than the press likes.
No such thing. There have been two French Empires under Napoleon I and Napoleon III; the term 'Third Empire' comes up whenever a President seems to be getting bigger ideas than the press likes.
no they taste the same
Napoleon Bonaparte.
No such thing. There have been two French Empires under Napoleon I and Napoleon III; the term 'Third Empire' comes up whenever a President seems to be getting bigger ideas than the press likes.
He established a new set of laws based on reason rather than tradition.
No.
He was an absolute ruler and therefore had better control over the state and the provinces of the empire.