Yes , it is fair because everyone , regardless of income , should have access to legal representation .
district attorney usually is the one pursuing the charges and making deals/pleas the attorney that defends you would be any available public attorney
The role of a defense attorney is the lawyer representing the person accused of committing a crime. In the United States, if a defendant cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed.
The defense attorney would help a person accused of a crime or in a civil case.
It depends whether they reported you to the police and what they accused you of.
The charges are very serious, the best choice would be to obtain the advice of an attorney who is experienced in criminal defense, even if the person has not been formally charged. Or,if they are arrested and charged for the crimes, at the arraignment the judge will ask if the person can afford counsel. If the accused cannot pay for a private attorney the judge will appoint a PDA.
The accused person is defended by a defense attorney or legal representative who advocates on their behalf in court. The defense attorney's role is to challenge the evidence presented by the prosecution and ensure the accused person's rights are protected throughout the legal process.
it guarantees a person who has been accused of a crime the right to a layer even if he/she cant afford one.
The accused's attorney can subpoena anyone they think may assist their case.
A person accused of a crime must be offered a lawyer. If the person can't afford a lawyer, the courts will appoint one for free.
The right to have an attorney & be presented with the Crown's case prior to the trial.
The District Attorney or the innocent person's attorney would be concerned. The judge or magistrate in the case would be concerned as well.
No. They must be afforded the OPPORTUNITY to be represented by counsel.