If it could be done it would be similar to renewable. (it is what the Sun does and Sunlight is looked at as renewable energy).
the most norenewable mineral is coal
The real question is: "Is oil non-renewable?" Oil makes gas and gas is non-renewable. So in conclusion to your question, yes gas is non-renewable
Nuclear Fusion
energy that can run out, such as coal or fossil fuels.
The fusion efficiency of the new technology for renewable energy production is currently being researched and tested to determine its effectiveness in generating sustainable energy.
Nuclear fusion is not renewable. It requires hydrogen nuclei as an energy source, and once these have been used in fusion they are not naturally replenished. In fact, fusion power has a very high energy change, rendering it near impossible to reverse the process. A star, for example, is powered by nuclear fusion, and will eventually die out due to a lack of hydrogen.
Amethyst is technically considered a renewable resource because it is a form of quartz, and new amethyst deposits can be formed over time. However, the process of natural amethyst formation is slow, so it is still considered a limited resource in practical terms.
Nonrenewable resources are resources that cannot be used up again
Yes, nuclear fusion is considered a potentially renewable energy source because it utilizes abundant sources of fuel (such as hydrogen isotopes) that are readily available on Earth. Additionally, fusion reactions produce no greenhouse gas emissions and generate significantly more energy than traditional nuclear fission.
Nonrenewable, eventually the oceans will run out of extractable deuterium. But thatt probably won't happen for a few million years.
It would technically be a nonrenewable resource, because the elements we use (uranium) will eventually run out.
Theoretically it is non-renewable. In practical terms it is almost inexhaustible. IF we could fuse hydrogen isotopes economically