Your question is a very difficult one to answer as the ancient's outlook on sexual activity was very different from ours. On the one hand, a certain amount of gay activity was tolerated, but on the other hand, certain gay men were looked down upon. The army would be no different from the rest of society in this area. If a man were gay and joined the army, the attitude would be "so what ?". There is no factual literature (at least that I know of ) that addresses this issue.
Your question is a very difficult one to answer as the ancient's outlook on sexual activity was very different from ours. On the one hand, a certain amount of gay activity was tolerated, but on the other hand, certain gay men were looked down upon. The army would be no different from the rest of society in this area. If a man were gay and joined the army, the attitude would be "so what ?". There is no factual literature (at least that I know of ) that addresses this issue.
Your question is a very difficult one to answer as the ancient's outlook on sexual activity was very different from ours. On the one hand, a certain amount of gay activity was tolerated, but on the other hand, certain gay men were looked down upon. The army would be no different from the rest of society in this area. If a man were gay and joined the army, the attitude would be "so what ?". There is no factual literature (at least that I know of ) that addresses this issue.
Your question is a very difficult one to answer as the ancient's outlook on sexual activity was very different from ours. On the one hand, a certain amount of gay activity was tolerated, but on the other hand, certain gay men were looked down upon. The army would be no different from the rest of society in this area. If a man were gay and joined the army, the attitude would be "so what ?". There is no factual literature (at least that I know of ) that addresses this issue.
Your question is a very difficult one to answer as the ancient's outlook on sexual activity was very different from ours. On the one hand, a certain amount of gay activity was tolerated, but on the other hand, certain gay men were looked down upon. The army would be no different from the rest of society in this area. If a man were gay and joined the army, the attitude would be "so what ?". There is no factual literature (at least that I know of ) that addresses this issue.
Your question is a very difficult one to answer as the ancient's outlook on sexual activity was very different from ours. On the one hand, a certain amount of gay activity was tolerated, but on the other hand, certain gay men were looked down upon. The army would be no different from the rest of society in this area. If a man were gay and joined the army, the attitude would be "so what ?". There is no factual literature (at least that I know of ) that addresses this issue.
Your question is a very difficult one to answer as the ancient's outlook on sexual activity was very different from ours. On the one hand, a certain amount of gay activity was tolerated, but on the other hand, certain gay men were looked down upon. The army would be no different from the rest of society in this area. If a man were gay and joined the army, the attitude would be "so what ?". There is no factual literature (at least that I know of ) that addresses this issue.
Your question is a very difficult one to answer as the ancient's outlook on sexual activity was very different from ours. On the one hand, a certain amount of gay activity was tolerated, but on the other hand, certain gay men were looked down upon. The army would be no different from the rest of society in this area. If a man were gay and joined the army, the attitude would be "so what ?". There is no factual literature (at least that I know of ) that addresses this issue.
Your question is a very difficult one to answer as the ancient's outlook on sexual activity was very different from ours. On the one hand, a certain amount of gay activity was tolerated, but on the other hand, certain gay men were looked down upon. The army would be no different from the rest of society in this area. If a man were gay and joined the army, the attitude would be "so what ?". There is no factual literature (at least that I know of ) that addresses this issue.
Yes they are.
Gay people with spouses and partners are allowed join the army. So no discussion is necessary at this time.
No, the Salvation Army no longer discriminates against gay people:The Salvation Army and the LGBT Community
Women were not allowed to serve as members of the Roman Legions.
Well, 5-10% of any army will be gay--the question is only whether the gay people are allowed to be open about it. Many armies allow openly gay people to serve, e.g. Israel.
No, but there were women with the Roman Army. Officers, centurions, and some soldiers were allowed to marry, and there were also women who stayed in the army camps and followed them on the march.... for various reasons.
George was probably not married as he was in the Roman army and members of the army were generally not allowed to be married.
Gaius Marius was the general who restructured the army and allowed the poor to enlist.Gaius Marius was the general who restructured the army and allowed the poor to enlist.Gaius Marius was the general who restructured the army and allowed the poor to enlist.Gaius Marius was the general who restructured the army and allowed the poor to enlist.Gaius Marius was the general who restructured the army and allowed the poor to enlist.Gaius Marius was the general who restructured the army and allowed the poor to enlist.Gaius Marius was the general who restructured the army and allowed the poor to enlist.Gaius Marius was the general who restructured the army and allowed the poor to enlist.Gaius Marius was the general who restructured the army and allowed the poor to enlist.
Yes.Yes.Yes.Yes.Yes.Yes.Yes.Yes.Yes.
No they werent.They had to stay home and cook,Clean,And Keeps their babies safe.
George was a Roman soldier and soldiers were generally not allowed to join the Roman Army. Therefore, Saint George was probably not married.
Roman roads allowed their army to move quickly to quell any rebellion by the native tribes.