Yes, 1 GHz is 1 billion cycles per second and 1 MHz is 1 Million cycles per second.
2 GHz (gigahertz) is faster than 733 MHz (megahertz). To compare, 1 GHz equals 1,000 MHz, so 2 GHz is equivalent to 2,000 MHz. Therefore, 2 GHz is significantly faster than 733 MHz, making it capable of processing more data in the same amount of time.
No. It is 100 MHz slower.
1795 mhz = 1.795 ghz there pretty close, but no.
Yes, 2.40 GHz is higher than 500 MHz. To compare the two, it's important to convert them to the same unit: 2.40 GHz is equivalent to 2400 MHz. Therefore, 2400 MHz is significantly greater than 500 MHz.
To compare 3.9 GHz and 150 MHz, we first convert both to the same unit. 3.9 GHz is equal to 3900 MHz. Now, dividing 3900 MHz by 150 MHz gives us 26. Therefore, 3.9 GHz is 26 times faster than 150 MHz.
MHz. 1000 MHz = 1 GHz.
1.10 MHz is tremendously slower than 750 MHz. If you meant 1.10 GHz vs. 750 MHz, then yes, 1.10 GHz is faster than 750 MHz.
There is about 1.04 GHz in 1066 MHz.
I don't understand the question, unless you are referring to Mhz and Ghz? if so: 1000 Mhz = 1 Ghz So if you had a 2.8 Ghz processor, that would be 2800 Mhz.
It takes exactly 1000 MHz to equal 1 GHz http://www.google.com/search?q=1+GHz+in+MHz&btnG
There are 1,000 megahertz (MHz) in 1 gigahertz (GHz). Therefore, to convert 6 GHz to MHz, you multiply 6 by 1,000. This means that 6 GHz is equal to 6,000 MHz.
It isn't a GHz yet... you need 1024 MHz to make 1 Ghz