Call of Duty is more realistic than halo and contains more blood. Call of duty also allows you to knife so in many ways halo is more appropriate but it doesn't necessarily mean its more fun.
Cod is way better than gaylo cod is way more real than gaylo you dont run into the open with an 100 kilo suit on getting shot. Cod is way more fun and gaylo (halo) . Also think about zombies you halo nerds out there.
IT all is based on opinoin. COD is for noobs and halo is a skillful game for casual and pro gamers alike.
it just depends which you like better. they are both great games. i enjoy Halo a lot more than COD though.
Answers will vary. CoD is modern and Halo is Futuristic. People lean to CoD more
Halo 3 and Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 are both good games. It depends on the player though. Halo 3 is mostly unrealistic but is played for fun. COD: Modern Warfare 2 Is more realistic but sometimes people tend to become serious because COD involves more shooting than Halo 3. - Henry
black ops has more better gun's then medal of honor and halo reach----------------- -halo reach suck's really bad
Cod is crap especailly the new...BLACK OPS.all cod games are crap and i shuld know cuz i got all the war games and cod is last...even halo is better than cod especially halo reach.. IF YOUR LOOKING FOR A REAL GAME GET ASSASSINS CREED BROTHERHOOD!!!!! XD
There really isn't a way to say which one is better. Some people like CoD, and some people like Halo. If you ask the question, you'll get people who automatically say one is better than the other because they play it. I personally play Halo, and I believe the Halo games require more skill, especially in multiplayer because you have shields. However, I also enjoy playing CoD and believe it is a great game. It depends on what you like.
To answer that question straight forward Halo reach is.
djjdej3nfr2end
its cod mw2 not halo
the halo 3 and cod world at war master appears to be deco rambo