They are conjugations of the verb see.
The auxiliary verb have forms the present perfect tense of "to see" which is have seen or has seen (the third-person singular form).
"Have seen" is a verb phrase in the present perfect tense, while "has seen" is its singular form used with "he," "she," or "it." Both forms indicate an action that took place at an unspecified time in the past with a connection to the present.
"Seen" is a past participle form of the verb "see" and is not used as a singular or plural verb on its own. It is often used with auxiliary verbs like "has been seen" or "had seen" to form verb tenses.
An example of an irregular verb in past participle form is "taken" from the verb "take."
The phrase "is you seen" is not proper English grammar. It appears to be a grammatical error, as "is" is the present tense form of the verb "to be" and "seen" is the past participle form of "see." A correct phrasing could be "have you seen?" or "did you see?" depending on the context.
No, "seen" is not an adverb. It is actually a verb form of the word "see." Adverbs are words that typically describe verbs, adjectives, or other adverbs.
Seen in is not tense. The verb seen is the past participle of see but a past participle by itself does not make a tense.have/has seen = present perfecthad seen = past perfectwas seen = passive
Yes, a main verb and a helping verb can be used together to form a verb phrase. The helping verb (also known as an auxiliary verb) comes before the main verb to help convey different tenses, moods, voices, or aspects of the action.
No. It is either an action verb (possess, own) or a helper verb (auxiliary verb) used to form perfect tenses (e.g. I have been, I have seen).
Yes, the form "Have you tea?" is technically correct but not a good modern form. The use of to have is seen in the modern form "Do you have tea?" -- This is the interrogative form of "you do have tea" as opposed to "you have tea."In this case "to have" is the verb and "do" is the auxiliary verb form, although similar in use to the modal verbs such as can.
The word at is a preposition indicating location or focus.Examples:"She was at the store." "The dance was at the auditorium" "They worked hard at solving the problem."The word seen is the participle form of the verb to see (vision, or understanding, or association)*the form uses a helper verb such as to be or to haveExamples:"They were seen together at the bank.""The process was seen as a breakthrough in manufacturing.""He has seen the doctor for his problem."
Seen is not an adverb, no.The word seen is a verb.
Yes, but it is never used alone as a verb.---The form seen is the past participle form of the verb to see.It appears in the perfect tenses : present, past, and future perfect, the conditional perfect (would have seen), and all of the passive voices.*activehave seen / has seenhad seenwill have seenwould have seen*passiveam seen / are seen / is seen / was seen /were seenhave been seen / had been seen/ will have been seen*conditionalcould have seenshould have seenmay/might have seenwould have been seencould have been seenshould have been seenmay/might have been seen(* when used with a noun, it is a participial rather than an adjective, e.g. "the man seen on the news")
An example of an irregular verb in past participle form is "taken" from the verb "take."
The verb is "to see" and the verb phrase is "had seen."
The verb in the sentence "I have seen the sun" is "seen." It is part of the present perfect tense construction "have seen."
base verb = see. I see Jon everyday.past = saw. I saw Jon yesterday.past participle = seen. I have seen Jon everyday this week.present participle = seeing. I am seeing Jon tomorrow.
Passive verb phrases are formed with a form of be = be + past participleFor example: is kept / was seen / werelostThe keys were lost near the car park.
'Has seen' is the verb phrase.