You should focus on grammar first.
How isn't it? Science is the method of understanding the natural world. Is not History part of the natural world and has not Science been used in history?
History belongs to the branch of archeology in science.
The phone number of the History Science And Technology is: 410-516-7501.
Nice question. Science is not about social studies, history, math, etc.
There are various connections between history and science. History has been greatly influenced by science; certainly the world today, in 2013, is a much different world, I would even say an utterly different world, than what it would have been had science never been developed. Science itself also has a history and the history of science has been studied by historians. And finally, historical investigations are often aided by scientific methodology and technology, for example, the use of carbon dating to find out how old something actually is.
Science in History was created in 1954.
History is a science because, the method used to evaluate historical sources is closely related to the scientific method. In school, history is considered a "social science."
How isn't it? Science is the method of understanding the natural world. Is not History part of the natural world and has not Science been used in history?
History belongs to the branch of archeology in science.
Social Science History was created in 1976.
science does relate to history because when the earth or some was formed for example the sun it was born on a date and dates relate to history
History and science are the foundation of who we are as people and the reason we as a species are who we are.
History is the social science that investigates past human activity.
Charles Joseph Singer has written: 'A short history of biology' -- subject(s): Biology, History 'The herbal in antiquity and its transmission to later ages' -- subject(s): Early works to 1800, Greek and Roman Medicine, Materia medica, Medical Botany 'A short history of scientific ideas to 1900' -- subject(s): History, Philosophy, Science 'A history of biology to about the year 1900' -- subject(s): Biology, History 'The earliest chemical industry' 'A short history of science to the nineteenth century' -- subject(s): Science, History 'A history of technology' -- subject(s): History, Civilization, Technology 'The story of living things' -- subject(s): Biology, History 'A history of scientific ideas' -- subject(s): History, Philosophy, Science 'Studies in the history and method of science' -- subject(s): Medicine, Science, History 'A history of biology' -- subject(s): Biology, History 'The evolution of anatomy' -- subject(s): Anatomists, Anatomy, History, Human anatomy 'Greek science and modern science' -- subject(s): History, Science 'The Christian failure' -- subject(s): Christianity, Controversial literature, Religion and science
No
Science is a scientific experiment, art is about talent and drawing, and history are social studies.
No it isn't. History would not be considered a science. Its lack of predictive value would disqualify it from being a science. It is nevertheless a valuable record of happenings, though perhaps only a partial record, for "History is written by the winners", as the phrase goes.