In general, hydroelectric power generation is much cheaper than plants using fossil fuels. In the second attached link, it is stated that the average operating cost for a hydroelectric plant is around six cents per kilowatt while an fossil fuel power plants operating cost average is above 2 cents per kilowatt.
More expensive to instal, cheaper to run
I will rephrase your question- Is the supply of fossil fuels sustainable? The answer is no. In the long run, we will have less and less fossil fuels. Fossil fuels are referred to as non-renewable fuels, which are taken from the earth's resources and used.
Burn less fossil fuels
When you burn fossil fuels to make enrgy, carbon dioxide is released. So, if you burn less fossil fuels, less carbon dioxide is released.
fossil fuels are very harmful to the environment so if there were less of them there will be less pollution which means less global warming...
Mainly two reasons. (1) The fossil fuels will eventually be used up. (2) Fossil fuels cause pollution.
They produce less emissions than traditional fossil fuels.
Because hydroelectricity electricity runned by water, and water is everywhere. You don't run out of water after. However, for fossil fuels, when you use all, like everysingle one on Earth, it's gone forever. GONE. ZERO. ZILCH. NADA(spanish word for zero. And no, I'm not spanish.). Thank You!
There are many disadvantages of burning fossil fuels. These include pollution and also burning fossil fuels has a mesurable cooling effect on the climate.There are many disadvantages of burning fossil fuels. These include pollution and also burning fossil fuels has a mesurable cooling effect on the climate.
the country produces less fossil fuel so it has to import from other Countries.
no
we use fossil fuels by cars because of the natural or people try to make a better earth by using less gas and by not paying to much money for gas