In general, hydroelectric power generation is much cheaper than plants using fossil fuels. In the second attached link, it is stated that the average operating cost for a hydroelectric plant is around six cents per kilowatt while an fossil fuel power plants operating cost average is above 2 cents per kilowatt.
More expensive to instal, cheaper to run
I will rephrase your question- Is the supply of fossil fuels sustainable? The answer is no. In the long run, we will have less and less fossil fuels. Fossil fuels are referred to as non-renewable fuels, which are taken from the earth's resources and used.
Mainly two reasons. (1) The fossil fuels will eventually be used up. (2) Fossil fuels cause pollution.
Because hydroelectricity electricity runned by water, and water is everywhere. You don't run out of water after. However, for fossil fuels, when you use all, like everysingle one on Earth, it's gone forever. GONE. ZERO. ZILCH. NADA(spanish word for zero. And no, I'm not spanish.). Thank You!
Fossil fuels are worst than hydroelectric power because when they are burnt to harness their energy, they release CO2, a greenhouse gas, this enhances the effects of global warming and as once fossil fuels have been mined and burnt, they are gone and will not reacumilate again for millions of years whereas hydroelectricity doesn't burn any carbon, releasing no CO2 and hydroelectricity's original source of power will never run out, making it much more efficient.
Burning less fossil fuels means fewer carbon dioxide emissions are produced during combustion. This reduction helps lower the overall concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, which helps mitigate the greenhouse effect and global warming. By using alternative energy sources and improving energy efficiency, we can lessen our reliance on fossil fuels and reduce carbon dioxide emissions.
Sulphur impurities in fossil fuels can be dealt with through a process called desulphurization. This involves treating the fuels with a desulphurizing agent to remove the sulphur compounds present. Alternatively, low-sulphur fossil fuels can be used, or technologies like fuel scrubbers can be employed to reduce sulphur emissions during combustion.
Yes, decreasing the use of fossil fuels can help reduce global warming. Fossil fuels release greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide when burned, which trap heat in the Earth's atmosphere and contribute to climate change. Transitioning to cleaner sources of energy, such as renewable energy, can help mitigate the impacts of global warming.
There are many disadvantages of burning fossil fuels. These include pollution and also burning fossil fuels has a mesurable cooling effect on the climate.There are many disadvantages of burning fossil fuels. These include pollution and also burning fossil fuels has a mesurable cooling effect on the climate.
Heat with wood to reduce your dependence on fossil fuels. Turn your lawn into an organic garden. Telecommute. Buy an electric car and renewable energy to reduce your dependence on fossil fuels.
less danger of explosion and less dangerous waste
You can change the air-to-fuel ratio to get less optimal combustion.