0
Intellectual property is a right in personam: an infringement case would be brought by the rightsholder against the infringer.
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is tort a violation of right in rem or in personam?
Tort is typically a violation of a right in personam, which means it affects a specific individual or their personal rights. It involves claims against a person rather than against a specific piece of property or land, which would be a violation of a right in rem.
What are the 3 types of jurisdiction used in a court case?
in personam, in rem and limitation on the types of cases a court can hear
Does judgment in rem prevail judgment in person-am?
No, they are different types of relief that can be given by the court. "In rem" refers to the object in dispute, and "in personam" to the litigant. A judgement in rem would be a declaration that a certain person is the owner of the property, but a judgement in personam might be an award of damages to be paid by the defendant for trespass, nuisance or some similar tort. Historically speaking, the ability of English courts of Law to make judgements in rem about certain property while the courts of Equity could make judgements in personam about the owners of the property led to the development of the concept of a Trust.
Jus in rem et jus in personam?
Jus in rem refers to rights directed towards or enforceable against a specific property, such as ownership or legal interests in a tangible asset. Jus in personam, on the other hand, refers to rights enforceable against a specific person or entity, such as contractual rights or obligations.
Does judgment in rem prevail judgemnt in personam?
Yes. Judgement in rem seldom sets precedent which is applicable to all judgement. Judgement in personam is always directed to particular person or persons whereas judgement in rem relates to a particular subject or theme. This particular subject or theme may affect a lot persons in their personal capacity. Therefore, any remark made by court in the form of judgement in rem shall always supercede judgement in personam.
Right in rem?
In rem \In rem\ [L.] (Law) Lit., in or against a (or the) thing; Note: used: (a) Of any right (called right in rem or jus in rem) of such a nature as to be available over its subject without reference to one person more than another, or, as generally expressed, a right competent, or available, against all persons. Rights in rem include not alone rights over physical property, but all rights available against all persons indifferently, as those of life, liberty, and reputation. (b) Of actions for recovering or reducing to possession or enjoyment a specific object, as in the enforcement of maritime liens against a vessel, which is made the defendant by a sort of personification. Most actions for the specific recovery of property in English and American law are in the nature of actions in personam against a person alleged to be unlawfully withholding the property.
If there is a dispute over ownership of property would a state have diversity jurisdiction in personam jurisdiction in rem jurisdiction or no jurisdiction at all?
Diversity jurisdiction is a basis for federal courts to exercise jurisdiction if the parties to a civil cause of action are residents of different states and the amount in controversy is large enough to make use of federal resources practical. A state may legitimately exercise jurisdiction either if it has in rem jurisdiction over the property or in personam jurisdiction over all parties to the dispute.
Illustrate the jus in personam and jus in rem?
The law of contract is different from other branches of law. It does not lay down any rights and duties that the law will enforce. It contains the limiting principles on the basis of which the parties can create there own rights and duties which the law will up hold. Law of contract creates jus in personam and not jus in rem. Here jus in rem means the right against a thing at large and jus in personam means the right against a specific person. Let us see what happened in the following illustration: Mr. A owes an amount of Rs.10,000 to Mr. B. Here Mr. B has the right to recover this amount from Mr. A and only from Mr. A and not from anybody else. This right is known as jus in personam. To understand the Jus in rem let us see the following example: Mr. X owns 10 acres of land. Here Mr. X is having the full liberty to enjoy the land against every members of the public. Likewise every members of the public is having an obligation that they should not disturb the right of Mr. X. This right of Mr.X is known as Jus in rem.
If you file chapter 7 bankruptcy and are discharged can a creditor later put a judgment against you for a mortgage on property you surrendered to them when you filed the bankruptcy?
No. The creditor can foreclose on the property (and virtually always do) since that is the way they get your name off of the deed and someone else's name on it. And, during this foreclosure, they will list you as a defendant since you are the property owner until the sheriff sale takes place. But, when the judgment is rendered in the foreclosure, it should be an "in rem" judgment, which means against the property only, and not an "in personam" judgment, which means against you personally. If they do get an in personam judgment against you, it is usually a good idea to notify the court and let them know about the bankruptcy so they remove the in personam judgment.
Which kind of property could not be subject to in rem jurisdiction?
a.an automobileb.all of the other choices could be subject to in rem jurisdictionc.real estated.furnituree.stock or bonds issued by a company
What is Acting against property not person?
in rem
Name a Legal term directed against property?
in rem
