answersLogoWhite

0

REM

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Law

Jus in rem et jus in personam?

Jus in rem refers to rights directed towards or enforceable against a specific property, such as ownership or legal interests in a tangible asset. Jus in personam, on the other hand, refers to rights enforceable against a specific person or entity, such as contractual rights or obligations.


Which kind of property could not be subject to in rem jurisdiction?

a.an automobileb.all of the other choices could be subject to in rem jurisdictionc.real estated.furnituree.stock or bonds issued by a company


Can a relative be arrested for rem oviong property from an estate without right?

Yes, a relative can be arrested for removing property from an estate without the legal right to do so. This is considered theft or misappropriation of assets from the estate, and the individual may face criminal charges and legal consequences for their actions. It is important to follow proper legal procedures in handling estate matters to avoid such situations.


What are the essential elements of the law of torts?

The essential elements of the law of torts include the existence of a duty of care owed by the defendant to the plaintiff, a breach of that duty, causation linking the defendant's breach to the plaintiff's harm, and the plaintiff suffering actual harm or loss as a result of the breach.


What does in rem judgment mean?

It means that the property was "sued" rather than the person who owns the property. In fact, the case may revolve around who is the rightful owner. You sometimes see cases with names like, "Health Department versus ten bushels of abandoned clams."

Related Questions

Is intellectual property a right in rem or right in personam?

Intellectual property is a right in personam: an infringement case would be brought by the rightsholder against the infringer.


What are the 3 types of jurisdiction used in a court case?

in personam, in rem and limitation on the types of cases a court can hear


Does judgment in rem prevail judgment in person-am?

No, they are different types of relief that can be given by the court. "In rem" refers to the object in dispute, and "in personam" to the litigant. A judgement in rem would be a declaration that a certain person is the owner of the property, but a judgement in personam might be an award of damages to be paid by the defendant for trespass, nuisance or some similar tort. Historically speaking, the ability of English courts of Law to make judgements in rem about certain property while the courts of Equity could make judgements in personam about the owners of the property led to the development of the concept of a Trust.


Does judgment in rem prevail judgemnt in personam?

Yes. Judgement in rem seldom sets precedent which is applicable to all judgement. Judgement in personam is always directed to particular person or persons whereas judgement in rem relates to a particular subject or theme. This particular subject or theme may affect a lot persons in their personal capacity. Therefore, any remark made by court in the form of judgement in rem shall always supercede judgement in personam.


Illustrate the jus in personam and jus in rem?

The law of contract is different from other branches of law. It does not lay down any rights and duties that the law will enforce. It contains the limiting principles on the basis of which the parties can create there own rights and duties which the law will up hold. Law of contract creates jus in personam and not jus in rem. Here jus in rem means the right against a thing at large and jus in personam means the right against a specific person. Let us see what happened in the following illustration: Mr. A owes an amount of Rs.10,000 to Mr. B. Here Mr. B has the right to recover this amount from Mr. A and only from Mr. A and not from anybody else. This right is known as jus in personam. To understand the Jus in rem let us see the following example: Mr. X owns 10 acres of land. Here Mr. X is having the full liberty to enjoy the land against every members of the public. Likewise every members of the public is having an obligation that they should not disturb the right of Mr. X. This right of Mr.X is known as Jus in rem.


Jus in rem et jus in personam?

Jus in rem refers to rights directed towards or enforceable against a specific property, such as ownership or legal interests in a tangible asset. Jus in personam, on the other hand, refers to rights enforceable against a specific person or entity, such as contractual rights or obligations.


Right in rem?

In rem \In rem\ [L.] (Law) Lit., in or against a (or the) thing; Note: used: (a) Of any right (called right in rem or jus in rem) of such a nature as to be available over its subject without reference to one person more than another, or, as generally expressed, a right competent, or available, against all persons. Rights in rem include not alone rights over physical property, but all rights available against all persons indifferently, as those of life, liberty, and reputation. (b) Of actions for recovering or reducing to possession or enjoyment a specific object, as in the enforcement of maritime liens against a vessel, which is made the defendant by a sort of personification. Most actions for the specific recovery of property in English and American law are in the nature of actions in personam against a person alleged to be unlawfully withholding the property.


If there is a dispute over ownership of property would a state have diversity jurisdiction in personam jurisdiction in rem jurisdiction or no jurisdiction at all?

Diversity jurisdiction is a basis for federal courts to exercise jurisdiction if the parties to a civil cause of action are residents of different states and the amount in controversy is large enough to make use of federal resources practical. A state may legitimately exercise jurisdiction either if it has in rem jurisdiction over the property or in personam jurisdiction over all parties to the dispute.


If you file chapter 7 bankruptcy and are discharged can a creditor later put a judgment against you for a mortgage on property you surrendered to them when you filed the bankruptcy?

No. The creditor can foreclose on the property (and virtually always do) since that is the way they get your name off of the deed and someone else's name on it. And, during this foreclosure, they will list you as a defendant since you are the property owner until the sheriff sale takes place. But, when the judgment is rendered in the foreclosure, it should be an "in rem" judgment, which means against the property only, and not an "in personam" judgment, which means against you personally. If they do get an in personam judgment against you, it is usually a good idea to notify the court and let them know about the bankruptcy so they remove the in personam judgment.


REM rebound involves the?

REM rebound involves the tendency for REM sleep to increase following REM sleep deprivation.


When one has a servitude over the land of another this right can be broadly classified as a what?

ius in rem aliena


What is plural of rem?

The plural form of rem is rem.Ex: I have a lifetime dose of 3 rem.