No, it is never a good idea. There is an old saying: "The man who acts as his own lawyer has a fool for a client".
You can defend yourself in court, but it is generally not a good idea.
Probably not a good idea. If you fail to show up in court on the assigned day, the other pary will win their case 'by default.' You may wish to ask the court if your case can be moved to another date on the docket.
Not a good idea. You wouldn't have a good grasp of the arguments that could be applied and the prior case law that could be called upon. And the court might not allow you to represent yourself in this situation.
No, but it is a good idea. There is nothing in the court system in the US that "requires" an attorney.
It would not be a good idea. The court probably will not allow you to bring the case without an attorney. And the knowledge of the law and the court processes is a big factor in being able to succeed.
That's adult age, so as long as you can support & provide a place (and can make a good case) I don't see why not. See what process is in family law court your local to get an idea of court costs.
United States v. Nixon
Good Idea! It helps to have a license when you go to Court!
If you're going to court, it's a good idea to have one.
To find an appellate attorney in California you would need to search the California's Court of Appeals case information website where you can get a good idea of the attorney's experience before you decide to contact them.
Legally, they can represent all the people on one side of the case. That is not always a good idea, however, because the individual interests may vary. For example, some people might want to settle the case, and others might want to continue to fight.
it would be an good idea. Just in case that job fails.