No its not.
Animal experiments are acceptable because human experiments aren't good. Since animals have systems like humans, it is acceptable to experiment on them.
No
a type of prejudice
killing animals for economic gain is acceptable
The practice of ascribing human characteristics to animals is called anthropomorphism,or Pathetic fallacy.
The reasoning of proving whether the experiment works or not, is acceptable or not, is reasonable or not.
The phenomenon of attributing human qualities to nonhuman objects is known as anthropomorphism. This literary and artistic device allows people to relate to and understand nonhuman entities, such as animals, objects, or even abstract concepts, by ascribing them human traits, emotions, or intentions. It is commonly used in storytelling, advertising, and animation to create relatable characters and enhance emotional connections. Examples include talking animals in children’s books or attributing feelings to inanimate objects in commercials.
killing animals for economic gain is acceptable
There is no set number of trials considered universally acceptable in an experiment. The number of trials needed can vary depending on the nature of the experiment, the desired level of statistical significance, and other factors. Typically, researchers aim for a sufficient number of trials to ensure reliable results.
This is known as personification. It involves attributing human characteristics or behaviors to something that is not human, such as animals, objects, or even abstract concepts. Personification is often used in literature to make the nonhuman thing more relatable or to convey a specific message or emotion.
It is unreligeous to experiment on animals.
yes