Now, see, if you built a building at the epicenter of an earthquake, no matter what what ground is there, the building will inevitably collapse. Near an earthquake's epicenter, though, is a different story. The best ground would definitely be solid, packed soil. The best foundation for a building would be isolated, unless you had a smaller building like a house, which would be better off with an anchored foundation. The best type of building would have steel frame crossties-only on a skyscraper or tall, large office building like in New York, though.
depends.. probably an aftershock or something t\depending how hard hte force was and how close to the epicenter you are
Right at top of the epicenter, the greatest shaking felt. It also depend on the types of soil. If the soil is soft then the intensity is amplified and where the soil is hard the intensity is damped.
It can crush your home, and it can cause exits to be hard to reach
hide under something like a table (because it is hard)
9.0. It was originally thought to be 8.9, but after official measurements came in, it was found to be 9.0. This is 5th largest earthquake worldwide since the beginning of the 20th century.
depends.. probably an aftershock or something t\depending how hard hte force was and how close to the epicenter you are
They cost a lot of money to build.
Right at top of the epicenter, the greatest shaking felt. It also depend on the types of soil. If the soil is soft then the intensity is amplified and where the soil is hard the intensity is damped.
Right at top of the epicenter, the greatest shaking felt. It also depend on the types of soil. If the soil is soft then the intensity is amplified and where the soil is hard the intensity is damped.
Right at top of the epicenter, the greatest shaking felt. It also depend on the types of soil. If the soil is soft then the intensity is amplified and where the soil is hard the intensity is damped.
8.9... Pretty hard...
theres two kinds of waves that are produced...P-waves and S-waves. its kinda hard to explain the difference between them, but if you google them you can find out more.
The strongest shaking is towards the center of the actual earthquake which it is called the focus. The epicenter of an earthquake is the point on the Earth's surface above the focus or hypocenter which is the point within the Earth where the rupture occurs. As such the epicenter is the closest point to this and the seismic waves have had to travel through the smallest amount of material and so have undergone the least amount of attenuation (in this case attenuation is a reduction in amplitude of the seismic waves due to energy being by moving through the Earth). However as with a lot of things in Earth sciences there can be exceptions to this! This is because the amplitude of seismic waves is affected by the density (related to the level of compaction in the case of soils) of the material through which it is traveling). So a seismic wave traveling through a hard rock such as granite will have a much lower amplitude than one traveling through a softer, less dense, poorly compacted material such as a soil and so due to the higher amplitude there will be a higher level of perceived and measurable ground shaking, even an equal distances from the epicenter.
Depends on how hard the earthquake's damage done on the Richter Scale
your mama vagina is very hard
alot 9.8
you should go under something hard