It is not better to have a greater population and it is not bad because it depends on what you mean by it for example, in terms of taxing, the government might make the taxes more expensive because they cant spread the money they need to the state with less population because if the government needs a lot of money then you might be taxed more.
The plan for better city low income housing, in the 1950s, was to build large housing complexes. The large housing complexes offered low rent for its occupants.
At-large.
I think it is true.
Sparse population refers to an area with a low density of people living there. This means there are fewer individuals spread out over a large geographic area. Sparse population areas often have limited access to services and infrastructure due to the low number of residents.
There are many factors that make Japan's population so large. There is a low rate of infant deaths and most people bear many children which contributes to the high growth of the population.
Sparse population refers to an area with a low density of inhabitants relative to its size. These areas typically have fewer people spread out over a large geographic area, leading to a sense of isolation and limited access to services and resources.
In states with a low population, members of the House of Representatives are chosen in the districts. This is to create a balance in the legislative representation.
Canada has a low population density because it has a large area and a low amount of people living there.
Low Hill's population is 2,888.
The population of William Low is 8,981.
low population
A large population can bring economic benefits through increased labor force, consumer base, and diversity of skills. However, challenges such as resource scarcity, strain on infrastructure, and environmental impact can also arise with a large population.