Landlord, Propery Owner, Boss, Employer-- no real difference. It really depends. To a Tenant, you're his Landlord. When referring to anything else, such as the property itself, you probably would say "property owner." By the way, for "Boss" vs. "Employer:" When you're talking to the employee, you're his Boss. When talking to someone else about the employee, for example, an agency trying to help the person, you say Employer.
Dueño is one form, this means owner.. it all depends on your context. You can also use propietario or casero.
It depends on what you are trying to say. "Twenty landlords showed up for the Property Owners' Forum." Landlords is the plural form of landlord. If you are talking about more than one, use landlords. "The landlord's rights were violated when his tenant tried to lease the yard to neighbors as a gardening cooperative." The landlord, one person in this case, has certain rights when it comes to the use of his property. Landlord's is the possessive form of landlord; the rights referred to are the rights belonging to the landlord.
It's under the ground of the property, yes. It's deemed a fixture of the property and must be repaired at the expense of the landlord. The issue would lie if such a provision existed in your lease stating that such responsibility is that of the tenant. However, a court would more than likely toss this provision as unconscionable because a tenant that is renting is not assuming the likelihood of damages to something that could not have reasonably inspected (you can't see through the ground).
No. A lease is a legally binding contract, which obligates both the landlord and tenant to a tenancy for the term of the lease. If you and the landlord both signed a lease, and the landlord refuses to give you occupancy of the property, you need to see a landlord-tenant attorney or tenant's rights group immediately!
The property will become owned by the state in which the property is located. When this happens we say the property "escheats" to the state.
I don't know Arizona laws specifically but ... I expect the law will say if the property had working air conditioning when you signed the lease and moved in, then it is the obligation of the landlord to maintain it in working condition.
Not for an adult riding on a public road. The landlord may however state something like "a bicycle helmet must be worn when riding on this property". Can't really say what he can do to enforce that though, apart from asking a person either to wear a helmet or to leave the property.
Absolutely. Many states have statutes that say exactly that the tenant must grant access.
yes you can say no to your landlord. that`s not a good answer but also not a good question. ask what you want to say no to.and then i`ll answer your question properly
As a co-owner of half of a house, you have the right to use and enjoy the property, share in any profits from its sale, and have a say in decisions about the property's management and maintenance.
"Owner wrecked car" or "Owner drove car into ground" It depends on the type of mistreatment.
For the most part it varies from state to state, but the majority say No