It's probably too late for this to do you any practical good, but:
You cannot "sue someone in criminal court". Suing is a civil matter.
You can sue someone in civil court, and they can still be tried by the government in criminal court. In fact, this happens quite frequently. The two cases are not necessarily tightly coupled, and it's possible for a defendant to win one and lose the other; to give a famous example, OJ Simpson was acquitted of criminal charges, but lost a civil suit stemming from the same incident.
Note that "possible" doesn't mean "likely". The officer mentioned in the discussion may have been giving you a realistic assessment of his experience with the local district attorney's office prioritization of cases, as opposed to just being lazy. For that matter, from your standpoint, winning a civil case (in which you might actually recover some of your expenses, though if someone is illegally driving without insurance, it's a fair bet they don't have much in the way of assets anyway) is more beneficial than sending the guy to jail, so he was actually doing you a favor.
No. Double jeopardy applies only to criminal charges.
The double jeopardy clause of the US Constitution applies only to criminal charges.
Double jeopardy is a procedural defence that forbids a defendant from being tried again on the same (or similar) charges following a legitimate acquittal.
He must have a single trial for both charges or it would be Double Jeopardy. Double Jeopardy only applies to being tried twice for the same crime. The act of robbery and the act of murder are separate crimes. Whether it is called Double Jeopardy or not they cannot treat the crimes separate and can not charge you for one after you have been tried for the other or you will have excellent grounds for appeal
Double Jeopardy Clause
It will depend on the crime that has been committed if a person can press charges 3 years after the crime. If is a different crime, it will depend on the statute of limitations. However, a person cannnot be charged for a crime twice. That's considered double jeopardy.
double jeopardy. Double Jepordy But it's very different in America, meaning you cannot be tried for the EXACT crime twice, but in Australia if you are tried and found innocent, you cannot be tried Guilty for the same crime.... That and Double Jeopardy is a movie =)
It is not the conduct that a person is tried for but the act. If a person did things in both states at different times it would not be what double jeopardy is about.
Amendment 5
Amendment 5
Double Jeopardy was released on 09/24/1999.
The Production Budget for Double Jeopardy was $40,000,000.
Sonja Gafner d'Aumeries has written: 'Le principe de la double incrimination' -- subject(s): Double jeopardy, Criminal jurisdiction