0
Is it correct to say one or more persons are residing or reside?
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
People are residing. It's 'to reside'.
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Which of these statements is a complete description of a family?
Family refers to a group of two or more persons related by birth, marriage, or adoption and residing together in a household. See more
Which of these terms refer to a group of two or more persons related by birth marriage or adoption and residing together in a household?
Family
Is persons an English word?
Yes, but it is normally more correct to use the word people.
What is the correct minimum coverage that you must have for Bodily Injury Liability for two or more persons in Florida?
20000
Is trafficking of persons correct?
Yes, persons can be used grammatically instead of people. Especially in law this helps to stop confusion. Person is a legal term so affecting more than one person is affecting persons. That lets you know that person is a label or a word with special meaning.
Is it ever correct to say me and John?
Yes! "She is with me and John." You can test it out by using the sentence with just one of the persons at a time. For instance, "She is with me." is correct. Also, "She is with John." is correct. Therefore "She is with me and John" is also correct. (However it might sound more natural to say "She is with John and me")
How much persons can sign a contract?
two or more persons
Is persons correct grammar?
Technically, no. Persons is a word; it is neither correct grammar nor incorrect grammar.The words "person" and "people" derive from different roots, and the plural of "person" really is "persons". However, the use of "people" as the plural of "person" is so widespread that "persons" sounds ... well, wrong most of the time.The currently recommended usage is:When you mean one person, use person. Simple enough.When you mean more than one person, considered as a group or community, use people.When you mean more than one person, but specifically want to stress that they're being considered as individuals, use persons. This is most likely to occur in formal legal usage, as for example in the phrase "this elevator is licensed for a maximum occupancy of 8 persons."For added fun, there's the construction "peoples", which has become more common over time as a shorthand way of saying "multiple distinct groups, nations, or cultures".
Where did more gods reside?
at olympus because aleins took people like apollo
Is it OK to say persons?
It depends on the context. Persons is technically correct grammar when talking about a certain number of humans. (I'm not going to use persons or people in my explanation to make things clearer.) For example, if you were talking about how many humans showed up to your party last night, you would say: "Yeah, man, about 20 persons were there last night."You use the word "people" when talking about a group or a generalized amount. For a group example, if you wanted to talk about the humans working at McDonald's, you would say, "I don't know how those people are still working there." (No offense if you work at McDonald's.) For a generalized amount example, if you wanted to talk, again, about how many humans came to your party, you would say, "Yeah, man, a lot of people came to the party last night."However, "people" is becoming more mainstream for anytime you're talking about more than one human. So while "persons" may technically be grammatically correct, others will probably think you're weird if you start saying "persons."
Is there a specific distance from home in the state of Indiana where a child can be considered a runaway if he crosses it?
No. The statute has more to do with your not residing in your parents/guardians home.
Is there more bones in a black persons foot?
no no no
