No. That would mean "excited like a cliff " which is nonsense. Use a word like "clearly" or "plainly" if you mean the excitement is evident; like "thoroughly" or "totally" if you mean it is all-encompassing.
"Both them and us were excited" is not correct usage. Look at how the pronouns would be used separately, then combine them in one, correct sentence. You would say "They were excited" not "Them were excited." Similarly, you would say "We were excited," not "Us were excited." The correct combination would be: "We and they were excited."
You can say either "excited to" or "excited about" an upcoming event, as both are commonly used and grammatically correct. It just depends on your personal preference.
Yes.
No. You can be excited about, or excited at, but not excited in. For example, you are excited about the opportunity of joining....
That is the correct spelling of the word "excited" (stimulated, agitated, enthusiastic). GET A DICTIONARY
Yes, the sentence "I am just as excited to see her" is correct. It conveys that the speaker is equally excited to see the person in question as someone or something else.
You would say "Ke ʻoluʻolu au" in Hawaiian for "I am excited".
Purely/utterly
It is a feeling of being excited about something.The meaning of enthusiasm is excited.
The correct spelling of the adjective is "enthusiastic" (excited).
hiamo - he tamaiti hiamo ia - she/he's an excited child
That is the correct spelling of the word "excited" (stimulated, agitated, enthusiastic). GET A DICTIONARY