yes
Nuclear wastes are sometimes said to be a problem too difficult to solve because the waste stays radioactive for so long. The only thing that gets rid of nuclear waste is time.
For now nuclear waste is stored on site where the waste was generated. In a few years US will begin to store nuclear waste in Yucca Mountain, Nevada but no official date has been set.
Nuclear energy production generates radioactive waste, which is considered hazardous due to its long-lasting radioactivity. Proper management and disposal of this waste is crucial to prevent environmental contamination and health risks. Regulations are in place to ensure that nuclear facilities safely handle and store hazardous waste to protect public safety and the environment.
One disadvantage of nuclear energy is the potential for accidents, such as meltdowns like the one at Chernobyl or Fukushima, which can have serious environmental and health consequences. Another disadvantage is the issue of nuclear waste disposal, as radioactive waste remains hazardous for thousands of years and requires secure long-term storage solutions. Additionally, nuclear power plants can be expensive to build and decommission.
There are arguments about where to store waste.
reduce, reuse, recycle, and store whatever is left.
Yes
Well it should be desirable in the long run to store it in one specialised place rather than on individual power plant sites as at present in the US
There are arguments about where to store the waste. (APEX)
This is a trick question Nuclear waste should not be stored at all. But as we have some and need to store it, where is an important consideration. Transport is risky. Where you store it has to be able to handle it if it leaks for a million years or so, at least until its safe to handle. The US government has a facility that sounds good, A old salt mine that could hold the danger for a very long time. But is it really in a geologically stable place? Can it leak waste? Will there be an accident moving the waste? Should special storage be built where the waste is?
This is a trick question Nuclear waste should not be stored at all. But as we have some and need to store it, where is an important consideration. Transport is risky. Where you store it has to be able to handle it if it leaks for a million years or so, at least until its safe to handle. The US government has a facility that sounds good, A old salt mine that could hold the danger for a very long time. But is it really in a geologically stable place? Can it leak waste? Will there be an accident moving the waste? Should special storage be built where the waste is?
nuclear waste is worst