answersLogoWhite

0

yes

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Why are nuclear waste sometimes said to be a problem too difficult to solve?

Nuclear wastes are sometimes said to be a problem too difficult to solve because the waste stays radioactive for so long. The only thing that gets rid of nuclear waste is time.


Where does the US send nuclear waste?

For now nuclear waste is stored on site where the waste was generated. In a few years US will begin to store nuclear waste in Yucca Mountain, Nevada but no official date has been set.


What is the relationship between hazardous waste and nuclear energy?

Nuclear energy production generates radioactive waste, which is considered hazardous due to its long-lasting radioactivity. Proper management and disposal of this waste is crucial to prevent environmental contamination and health risks. Regulations are in place to ensure that nuclear facilities safely handle and store hazardous waste to protect public safety and the environment.


Which is a disadvantage to nuclear energy?

One disadvantage of nuclear energy is the potential for accidents, such as meltdowns like the one at Chernobyl or Fukushima, which can have serious environmental and health consequences. Another disadvantage is the issue of nuclear waste disposal, as radioactive waste remains hazardous for thousands of years and requires secure long-term storage solutions. Additionally, nuclear power plants can be expensive to build and decommission.


Which is a problem caused by using nuclear energy?

There are arguments about where to store waste.


How can we deal with nuclear waste?

reduce, reuse, recycle, and store whatever is left.


Are radioactive nuclear waste store in airtight containers made of glass?

Yes


Why should they store nuclear waste at yucca mountain?

Well it should be desirable in the long run to store it in one specialised place rather than on individual power plant sites as at present in the US


What is a problem caused by using nuclear energy (apex)?

There are arguments about where to store the waste. (APEX)


Where should nuclear waste should be stored?

This is a trick question Nuclear waste should not be stored at all. But as we have some and need to store it, where is an important consideration. Transport is risky. Where you store it has to be able to handle it if it leaks for a million years or so, at least until its safe to handle. The US government has a facility that sounds good, A old salt mine that could hold the danger for a very long time. But is it really in a geologically stable place? Can it leak waste? Will there be an accident moving the waste? Should special storage be built where the waste is?


Where should nuclear waste not be stored?

This is a trick question Nuclear waste should not be stored at all. But as we have some and need to store it, where is an important consideration. Transport is risky. Where you store it has to be able to handle it if it leaks for a million years or so, at least until its safe to handle. The US government has a facility that sounds good, A old salt mine that could hold the danger for a very long time. But is it really in a geologically stable place? Can it leak waste? Will there be an accident moving the waste? Should special storage be built where the waste is?


Is e waste worse than nuclear waste?

nuclear waste is worst