Want this question answered?
That requires a prescise definition of 'wrong', and there are many that can be chosen. The best answer is no; it is not always wrong to take a human life, if taking that life means that more than one life will not be taken instead (minimising harm through choosing the option which has the highest penalty for nonselection).
Plants give out oxygen, take in carbon dioxide while Human give out carbon dioxide and take in oxygen
food is absorbed into the small intestine and the transported around body in blood. heart pumps oxygenated blood and during this the lungs take in the oxygen out of the food.
It is the active ingredient in Dramamine, so yes.
Because they where able to take a look at the human body and see how it works and what's inside the human body. Hope I helped ~Stephanie
hurricanes often take human lifes by drowning them
I don't think he does. In the season finale, he sacrifices his human life by signing away the Shanshu prophecy in order to take down Wolfram and Hart.
what is an acceptable action to take outside the workplace
Because he thought that they would have a better life
Survival - Human life.
Everything necessary to support human life.
The oldest age that a human being has ever lived to be is around 112 years old. If you take all the precautions in life and take care of your body you should live a long life. DON'T smoke, drink, or do drugs and you should be good.No! no no no no no no no! i don't think so! human can last up to 120 years old! my teacher taught me that! SO listen people! live wealthy enough to be in the history's oldest person in the whole wide world!
the speaker compare human life with river as in human life there are many problems human being cant face it and take his step aside wherealse river problem are like pebbles or hurdels in his way river cannt take a back step lke humans they still face their problem and rechies toward with proud and honour
That requires a prescise definition of 'wrong', and there are many that can be chosen. The best answer is no; it is not always wrong to take a human life, if taking that life means that more than one life will not be taken instead (minimising harm through choosing the option which has the highest penalty for nonselection).
It means that, that is what God gave you your human life and no one can take that away from you only with the end of the road death. So if you are as human as you can be you can't change.
It means that, that is what God gave you your human life and no one can take that away from you only with the end of the road death. So if you are as human as you can be you can't change.
It can take or not take. Both are acceptable.