Flooding kills people and destroys property.
It could be good agriculturally, and was since the times of Ancient Egypt, when the floods dumped fertile alluvial soil over the Nile River banks. But it could be bad if the floods were severe, because it would wash away any growing crops. Since the construction of the Aswan High Dam in 1970, Egypt gets no Nile floods, beneficial or otherwise. However, they still occur in Sudan, which is above (south of) the dam.
No, the impact of floods can have many effects, some good and some bad. In ancient Eggypt the annual Nile floods were anticipated as a way of revitalizing the soil with a fresh deposit of fertile silt.
It's good and bad because crops need water and sun-light to grow so the sun-light ( we're not talking about ) is covered , but the floods provide water giving great soil which leads to good crops. The bad part is that floods can take out your crops. But mostly good for crops.
pretty freakin likely. Dont use vulagr language. be a good Mormon Please. Not a bad One
the impacts is that human throw thing like can and paper in the river and it start get bad for humans i understand the question and the impact is that due to the Mississippi river we are able to part :)
Industrial pollution is a concern along the Mississippi River. Industries have contributed significant amounts of oil, aluminium, lead, and other industrial wastes such as sulphur-dioxide, hydrogen sulphide, and benzene to the flow of the Mississippi.
very bad
The Yellow river was concieved "good and bad" because the river once overflowed and killed thousands. So, during May and April, the monsoons overflow the river rusulting in catostraphic changes. The river is also called "good" because the the river nurtures the plants and animals, resulting in good crops.
man made flood are bad because there bigger
because they had no friends
James town river
NO