I feel that that is not correct. Usually you would say there is nothing or there isn't anything.
If you use it in this sentence, it would be incorrect
There is not anything I can do for you.
It still sounds funny, here is how you would be pronounced
There is nothing.
Because it's grammaticaly correct. For example, I would say, "I am going to India. After that, I am going to the USA." USA is short for United States of America. So, I would say I am going to the United states of America.
Yes. "Guess who we saw today" is a command, and is considered acceptable grammar. actually, that person is wrong. It is actually incorrect. Though it is a command, since the person "who" is the direct object and is not the subject, it would then be changed to whom. So the correct answer would be, "Guess whom we saw today." I know, strange sounding, but it is grammaticaly correct.
This is not correct grammar. The correct way to say this would be "Unless we hurry, we will be late for the show." You would not say anything if you were not going to be late.
yes it means that you did not touch anything
You could say; "You didn't really have anything to do".
You can say that - to change or transfer anything from one place to another
What plus what will give you 33 under the same number
"quand est-ce ton anniversaire", "c'est quand ton anniversaire"(not quite grammaticaly perfect but the most in use), or "quel est le jour de ton anniversaire" (correct but less in use)
No. 'There won't be anything urgent for you' is correct.
And it's been thirty one days to months. ('aux' is not grammaticaly correct, so the sentence doesn't make sense, it should be 'et' which means 'and').
Does this have anything to do with you
Two can be correct; one is not correct.Have you got anything to tell me is a correct question.Have you got anything telling me is an incorrect use of the word telling.Have you got anything, tell me is a correct question if you add a comma after the word anything.