A large portion of the U.S. population is conditioned to believe that a third-party candidate cannot win a U.S. presidential election. Therefore many believe that a vote for a third-party presidential candidate is a wasted vote. That may be the quintessential example of a self-fulfilling prophesy; it is the belief itself that makes it true. The belief has been disproved on the state level by gubernatorial candidates such as former professional wrestler and former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura.
U.S. history shows that a third party normally does not establish itself as one of the two major parties until one of the existing two major parties collapses due to excessive internal division. Surely there were some who thought the Republican party was heading down that path in 1912.
Having three or more strong candidates in a U.S. presidential election increases the likelihood of no one receiving the required minimum of electoral votes, causing the election to be taken out of the hands of the voters and the electoral college and put in the hands of the House of Representatives. The same rules are still in effect that caused that to happen in 1824.
Perhaps a break from the electoral college system would result in the needed break from the vicious cycle of the errant belief that a third-party candidate cannot win a U.S. presidential election.
Harriman was a strong candidate for the Democratic nomination in 1952 and 1956 but was not nominated.
No. Although the incumbent president is very likely to be nominated for a second term, if there is strong reason to be believe that he will not win re-election and if another attractive candidate emerges, an incumbent president can fail to get the nomination.
You need to have a strong background in politics. Find someway to show a candidate for presidency what you have accomplished. They may possibly interview you and then choose you. VP's are next in line to be a president. They make important decisions as well.
Nixon had a strong anti-Communist image
There are many personality traits and soft skills that will make you a strong candidate. If you are charming you will likely make a good candidate for example.
Many people liked the strong way Bush responded to the 9-11 attacks. The incursions into Iraq and Afghanistan seemed to justified and prudent, and were expected to be over soon. The Democrats ran a weak candidate in opposition.
x
If no candidate receives the necessary votes in the Electoral College, the election goes to the House of Representatives. In the House, each state gets one vote. So the representatives of the state gather and vote within their delegation and then vote as one on the House floor. The person who receives a majority (26) is elected President. There are some problems with voting in the House. The small states (population wise) have the same influence as the larger states. If a majority of representatives from a state cannot agree on a candidate, that state loses its vote. If some members of the House favor a strong third-party candidate, it could make it difficult for any candidate to get the needed 26 votes.NovaNet: The House of Representatives
because your bones will weaken and if your on a proper diet and drink milk then your bones will stay strong.
In a job interview, you might be asked why you would be an excellent candidate for this position. You can answer with your strong points.
In a presidential election, the term "favorite son" refers to a candidate who receives strong support from their home state. This candidate is often seen as a regional favorite and may attract local voters due to their strong ties to the state. However, it is important to note that a favorite son candidate typically struggles to gain widespread national support necessary for winning the election.
A political candidate who is not a leading contender but receives unexpectedly strong support is often referred to as a "dark horse" candidate. This term is used to describe someone who emerges as a strong competitor despite having initially been underestimated or overlooked.