Yes. A bar graph of frequencies for classes of heights seems a perfectly sensible way to present the information.
because of the tipe of trees
a graph that contains at least one null vertex is called forestanswer from :abdul rasheed rind: "the collection of trees is called forest"SS:A forest is an undirected graph, all of whose connected components are trees; in other words, the graph consists of a disjoint union of trees.
An Abney level is an apparatus for measuring the heights of trees.
Cayleys formula states that for a complete graph on nvertices, the number of spanning trees is n^(n-2). For a complete bipartite graph we can use the formula p^q-1 q^p-1. for the number of spanning trees. A generalization of this for any graph is Kirchhoff's theorem or Kirchhoff's matrix tree theorem. This theorem looks at the Laplacian matrix of a graph. ( you may need to look up what that is with some examples). For graphs with a small number of edges and vertices, you can find all the spanning trees and this is often quicker. There are also algorithms such as depth-first and breadth-first for finding spanning trees.
If the distribution of heights were symmetric then it would be 1/2 but the distribution is not at all likely to be symmetric. There will by many young trees of varying heights whereas the mature trees are likely to reach similar heights. The distribution is, therefore, likely to be negatively skewed, which means that the probability is greater than 1/2.
"Try saying three tall trees" is correct.
Lumberjacks can fall from great heights. They can have trees fall on them. It is a risky job.
The collective noun for palm trees is a grove of palm trees.
The trees in the emergent layers can range from heights 35 to 50 meters.
Gregory Lawrence Chesson has written: 'Synthesis techniques for transformations on tree and graph structures' -- subject(s): Data structures (Computer science), Graph theory, Trees (Graph theory)
No of spanning trees in a complete graph Kn is given by n^(n-2) so for 5 labelled vertices no of spanning trees 125
It may be correct or incorrect. It depends where you live.