Yes, the BMI scale does not take into account body fat percentage, so, it would be possible to be physically fit but clinically "overweight" due to muscle mass. It would also be possible to be "fat" but have a normal BMI, due to a lack of muscle tone.
It is possible to be outside what is considered normal and fall into the obese category in the charts without being obese. It is a common occurance in body builders that the dense muscle mass puts them well over the normal weight for their height, yet there is no fat on their bodies.
Linnaeus classified organisms based on their morphological similarity.
It's all based on how much overweight you are
the material usually classified based on their properties.
The igneous geodes are classified as intrusive and the sedimentary geodes are classified as chemical based on properties.
Aristotle classified plants based on the presence or absence of woody tissue. He categorized plants into trees, shrubs, and herbs based on their growth form. Additionally, he classified plants based on their reproductive structures and life cycle.
Animals are classified based upon their anatomy, physiology, genetics and behaviors.
Classified as inorganic.
The sympathetic nervous system can be classified as adrenergic, based on the main neurotransmitters used.
Words are classified as parts of speech based on their function as a word. If they are classified based on their role in the sentence, they are parts of a sentence. (there is not much difference between the two, but there is a difference)
Landscapes are classified in various ways in geography. In most cases, they will be classified based in the formation and the physical features that they posses.
Character Based
It is not necessarily hereditary but an overweight mother or father is more likely to have an overweight child simply based on how they eat. On the other hand, 2 healthy parents can have an overweight child even though they eat healthy.