No
A Holocaust is not a regular occurrence. It was a policy of genocide instigated by the Nazi German state up to 1945. Hopefully there will be no "next Holocaust".
The wording of the question implies that the holocaust was some kind of dispute. It was genocide and there was nothing to "settle".
isreal, france, miep gies
It is possible. In fact it is an everyday occurrence.
The theory of continental drift.
The Holocaust was genocide. It an attempt to kill all Jews. It was not some dispute that could have been 'resolved'.
There is no specific term for a person disputing the claims of a Holocaust denier. There is no point nor need in drawing a distinction between Jews and non-Jews on that side of the argument.
When the People's Republic of China was established on the Chinese mainland in 1949, Chinese nationalists fled to the island of Taiwan. Since that occurrence, there has been a dispute over whether Taiwan is part of China or a separate, sovereign country.
Arthur Butz wrote a book titled "The Hoax of the Twentieth Century," in which he denies the occurrence of the Holocaust. This book has been widely discredited by historians as promoting Holocaust denial, a form of antisemitism.
It's not possible to make case law without a case in dispute.
No, 95 degrees C would not be a natural occurrence.
yes, Hitler was.