Yes. However, it is not yet economically practical, as it takes more energy to convert the biomass into hydrogen than we can get from using the hydrogen for fuel.
biomass, fuel cells, fusion, electrylosis
Sugar cane wastes are considered biomass fuel because they are organic materials derived from plants that can be used to produce energy. Methane, gasohol, and hydrogen are not considered biomass fuel, although they can be produced from biomass sources like sugar cane wastes through different conversion processes.
It is fuel that is created by enriching uranium. this is one of many alternative resources(Hydrogen, wind, hydropower, geothermal, solar, and biomass)
biomass
No, hydrogen is not a fossil fuel because it is not derived from ancient organic matter like oil, coal, and natural gas. Hydrogen is an element that can be sourced from a variety of resources, including water, biomass, and renewable electricity.
No, biomass doesn't necessarily have to be a fuel at all, nor does it have to be plant material.
CHARCOAL is considered a biomass fuel because it is derived from organic matter (wood) and not from fossilized remains. It is renewable and sustainable as it comes from plants that can be replanted and harvested.
Fecal material is a biomass and is renewable.
Hydrogen fuel cells are not inexhaustible, as they rely on hydrogen, which must be produced from various sources, such as natural gas, water, or biomass. While hydrogen itself is the most abundant element in the universe, the methods of extracting and producing it can be energy-intensive and may involve the consumption of finite resources. Additionally, the sustainability of hydrogen fuel cells depends on the energy source used for hydrogen production, which can impact their overall environmental footprint. Thus, while hydrogen is abundant, the fuel cell technology is not limitless in its current production methods.
Fill it
I suppose that is not possible; and also is not economic.
Biomass