No, it is the opposite.
Passive voice is not typically considered direct, natural, or forceful. It is often used to focus on the recipient of the action rather than the doer, which can make it indirect or less forceful compared to active voice. Each voice has its own strengths and weaknesses depending on the context and desired effect.
It isn't direct or forceful.
Using passive voice can make your writing less engaging and clear to the reader. It can also obscure the action or the doer of the action in the sentence. Additionally, passive voice can result in wordy and awkward construction.
Indirect.
Depending with the subject, passive voice makes army writing clear and direct communication.
Active voice means putting the actor with the action. Passive voice: The man was stung by a bee. (The word "by" is a clue that it is passive.) Active voice: A bee stung the man. (The bee is the actor-- a bee stings.) Passive voice: The phone bill was paid by me. Active voice: I paid the phone bill. Active voice is natural, direct, but makes the actor do the action which makes the sense clear.
The passive voice of ''what do you do'' is "what is done by you?"
"Your name is not known by me." is passive voice.
Yes, in a sentence with both a direct and indirect object, the indirect object typically precedes the direct object. For example, in the sentence "She gave him a book," "him" is the indirect object and "book" is the direct object.
No, "He is a boy" is not in passive voice. Passive voice involves rearranging the sentence to emphasize the receiver of the action rather than the doer, which would change the sentence to something like "The boy is being called."
Passive voice
Using the active voice rather than passive voice
I finished my research paper two days early.