0
Is it true a scientists opinion is a valid source of information to use in a scientific investigation?
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What questions are outside the realm of science?
Some questions are beyond the boundaries of scientific investigation because we either dont have enough information/knowledge to answer the or simply because sometimes there is not a scientific answer for everything :)
How a scientific theroy differs from a guess or an opinion?
A scientific theory is based on a practical work of a scientists who on the basis of these practicals they deliver theories with solid and proved methods but a guess or opinion is an idea of ours which is not based on practicals or just a hypothesis.Scientific theories are often proved true but we can say nothing about a guess
Why do scientists make observations?
Scientists first evolve a logical methodology that must have universal conclusion. Every data is therefore first observed to determine it can be determined to be concluded as the universally accepted truth. Inference is a conclusion that may involve a personal biased opinion while universally accepted inferences are scientific.
Can a good scientific opinion be false?
It is sometimes possible to arrive at a reasonable conclusion based on the information that is available, and be wrong. Without sufficient information it is sometimes impossible to arrive at the truth.
When do scientists use observational research and opinion?
Its a good idea
What is a scientific opinion article?
A scientific opinion is normally held by a scientific body such as a 'learned society' or 'national organisation' or perhaps a science-based government body. It is the formal consensus position of the scientists of that organisation. More abstractly, scientific opinion (analagous to public opinion) is the consensus between the various published scientific opinions, and need not be unique (eg: their could be two dissenting groups of opinions). Generally, inidividual scientists opinions do not contribute to 'scientific opinion' in the same way scientific organisational opinions do (because they are somewhat irrelevant, in the same way that fringe opinions of individual public do not necessarily impact on 'public opinion' generally) As for 'scientific opinion article' I would guess it is an article which presents or explores scientific opinion as above. Normally scientific opinion is formulated from scientific bodies issuing 'position statements' and the like, not articles. I really appreciate this article, I feel this was of great help Its just amazing, the scientific knowledge is explained clearly here
What questions are outside the realm of science?
Some questions are beyond the boundaries of scientific investigation because we either dont have enough information/knowledge to answer the or simply because sometimes there is not a scientific answer for everything :)
How a scientific theroy differs from a guess or an opinion?
A scientific theory is based on a practical work of a scientists who on the basis of these practicals they deliver theories with solid and proved methods but a guess or opinion is an idea of ours which is not based on practicals or just a hypothesis.Scientific theories are often proved true but we can say nothing about a guess
Is the scientific method how scientists come up with ideas?
no, the scientific method is how scientists determine whether their ideas have any real-world merits.>in the Scientific Method they have the identification of the problem or purpose in why they are going to do something then the experiment so after observation they can come up with a hypothesis which is their opinion on the case and then they will try to prove that their hypothesis is real and there they had the idea or result that solves the problem or purpose.
Why do scientists make observations?
Scientists first evolve a logical methodology that must have universal conclusion. Every data is therefore first observed to determine it can be determined to be concluded as the universally accepted truth. Inference is a conclusion that may involve a personal biased opinion while universally accepted inferences are scientific.
Why does Answers com publish an etymology of the phrase carbon neutral which states that carbon IS a contributor to global warming when according to all research so far this is not proven to be fact?
Because there is no such thing as a 'scientific fact'. Even gravity is not a 'scientific fact'. Scientists do not work with 'facts' but will levels of confidence, of probability. When there is a high level of confidence among the entire scientific community on a particular issue, that is called a 'consensus'. When a scientists has a different opinion (ie, after conducting research and writing a scientific paper), such a differing opinion is generally called a 'hypothesis'. For example: the general scientific consensus is that the earth is round. However, there are still some hypothesis regarding the earth being flat. As long as scientists claiming the earth being flat are not able to convince their fellow scientists through validated research methods which can be repeated by others and peer-reviewed publications in scientific journals, the scientific consensus will not alter. Same is applicable to carbon. The general consensus is that it is a contributor to Global Warming while a minority of scientists have differing hypothesis. Some day their hypothesis might become the general consensus but for that to happen they first have to convince their fellow scientists of the validity of their scientific claims and their research.
Can a good scientific opinion be false?
It is sometimes possible to arrive at a reasonable conclusion based on the information that is available, and be wrong. Without sufficient information it is sometimes impossible to arrive at the truth.
Scientists took pictures of the snow leopards found in Central Asia is it a fact or opinion?
opinion
What is the scientific method and how is it related to induction?
Scientific method refers to a body of techniques for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous knowledge. Induction is the long-run validity of the rule of induction is deducible from the principle that the real is only the object of the final opinion to which adequate investigation would lead
When do scientists use observational research and opinion?
Its a good idea
How is your opinion and scientific evidence related?
My Answer:An opinion is an idea that may be formed from evidence!
What do you think is the most important issue in science today?
My opinion is that freedom and funding of scientific research is the most important issue today. It has become a common practice of today's governments to regulate what scientists are allowed to research, with what funding, where their funding comes from, and what results they are allowed to report. Governments have been attempting to control scientific progress and scientific results. Overall this only inhibits the scientific community as a whole and slows down the further development of the human race. This is the most important matter in the scientific community in my opinion, for it can effect every field of science and can happen anywhere in the world.
