I wouldn't say that. Today we think illiterate to mean unable to read or write or having a very limited education/schooling. In the 1st Century, parents and the religious centers would educate the children - particularly the male children. So each of the Apostles knew the Scripture and could read and probably write.
The twelve disciples/apostles were ordinary men whom God used in an extraordinary manner. Among the twelve were fishermen, a tax collector, and a revolutionary. The calling of the Apostle to the Gentiles, Saul of Tarsus aka Paul, was a well educated Pharisee under the tutelage of the scholar Gamaliel.
Yes, LeVar was illiterate up until the time he auditioned for the reading rainbow.
False!
19
That is highly unlikely. Illiterate is defined as being unable to read or write, or demonstrating a very limited education and level of literacy. Were we all illiterate, we would be unable to read this question or answer it.
The Disciples were illiterate fishermen. Paul was the first literate early disciple it was not until the church grew that it had the skills to record what the Apostles said.
Yes. After all, who liked George W. Bush but illiterate fools and rednecks?
illegible illegitimate illiterate illogical These all mean not. (Not logical = illogical)
Not all of them. The poor commoners were illiterate. The rich ones and the middling income ones, instead, could afford an education.
Not likely; the apostles were all Semitic Jews.
No, Judas who betrayed Our Lord is not a saint. All the other apostles are considered saints.
The illiterate man struggled to read the instructions on the packaging.
All the Christian churches are continuing the work of the apostles.