No
It's not only economists that offer this warning. It's true anywhere that correlation coefficients are to be interpreted. Let me offer an example from psychology. In many populations there's a significant correlation between the shoe sizes of people and their intelligence quotients. But no-one would say that increasing a person's shoe size would increase their intelligence!
That is not true. It is true for a simple random sample but not one that is systematic.
As n increases the sampling distribution of pˆ (p hat) becomes approximately normal.
It has the same shape, mean, and standard deviation as the population.
The statement is false. For a fixed alpha, an increase in the sample size will cause a decrease in beta (but an increase in the power).
No, and I can prove it.
There is no evidence that a persons shoe size has anything to do with how large their penis is
yes
some run big and some run small, for example:i wear a size 7 in street shoe, but my bonts i wear a size 5, powerslides run true to size, luigino you usually get one size bigger.
No. This is not true.
that is not true
They usually run a half size bigger.
Runs much smaller.
Well this is a old legend. i guess if its been tested its probably true. but theres not really a way of telling
False and True London is bigger in size but New York has more people
no romes was bigger
Nope. All it means is you've got big shoes.